- Feb 6, 2016
- 1,213
- 0
- 0
Re: Re:
I also agree with this. However, Dimension Data have a potentially decent leadout train (Eisel, EBH, Cummings, Farrar, Renshaw) for the Tour, while EQS will probably only bring Sabatini - who is far from perfect, but can certainly improve - or Richeze; that's even less than Giant-Alpecin could offer, and anyway Cavendish is certainly a better freelancer and better at positioning than Kittel, so their power imbalance could be somewhat levelled.
PremierAndrew said:King Boonen said:PremierAndrew said:King Boonen said:Cav looked very, very good there compared to recent times. But Kittel is still coming back into form and beat him...
Also Cav ran out of steam right at the end. 2008-2012 Cav would have found his second kick and won that sprint. Nonetheless, that's one of the best sprints (if not the best) I've seen from Cav in the last two years
Aye, don't get me wrong, it was a very good sprint. I've always rated Cav in the top three sprinters over the past few years, even though he's declining, but I think Kittel is a class above and he'll be even better in the TdF.
Yeah that sums up my opinion on Cav quite nicely too
I also agree with this. However, Dimension Data have a potentially decent leadout train (Eisel, EBH, Cummings, Farrar, Renshaw) for the Tour, while EQS will probably only bring Sabatini - who is far from perfect, but can certainly improve - or Richeze; that's even less than Giant-Alpecin could offer, and anyway Cavendish is certainly a better freelancer and better at positioning than Kittel, so their power imbalance could be somewhat levelled.