No he is not. We are in the least talented sprinters era ever. Cav would win with one leg 5 sprints in the Tour.Merlier is one of the most underestimate rider in the peloton.
I think that with the actual Philipsen would not be so easy (despite in my opinion Cav is the best sprinter of all times, same level as Cipollini as sprinter, better in general)No he is not. We are in the least talented sprinters era ever. Cav would win with one leg 5 sprints in the Tour.
Cav isn't even better than peak Kittel!I think that with the actual Philipsen would not be so easy (despite in my opinion Cav is the best sprinter of all times, same level as Cipollini as sprinter, better in general)
And so it is written, and so it shall come to passUnfortunately, it looked like there was a crash.
Boxers should stay in the ring.Easy for Merlier when everyone else is either boxed on or just not good enough.
Nacer Bouhanni: "why not do both?"Boxers should stay in the ring.
I wish I could find races to enter where everyone else is just not good enough to beat meEasy for Merlier when everyone else is either boxed on or just not good enough.
I disagree.We are in the least talented sprinters era ever.
Yeah, what about the year when Stuart O'Grady almost won the green jersey. Those memorable battles between him, Erik Zabel, and Sven Teutenberg lol.I disagree.
Depends on what you base it on. I we took Cavendish of 2011, I think he would have won less these days - the routes have become tougher, and the speeds are higher, so he would have struggled on certain medium stages today.No he is not. We are in the least talented sprinters era ever. Cav would win with one leg 5 sprints in the Tour.
and it seems no one wants to dedicate an entire tour squad to a leadout train. Fighting for 9th GC is oh so crucial these days. Cav would have half the wins if he didn't have those leadoutsDepends on what you base it on. I we took Cavendish of 2011, I think he would have won less these days - the routes have become tougher, and the speeds are higher, so he would have struggled on certain medium stages today.
You forgot Jakub MareczkoCav isn't even better than peak Kittel!
In 2009, which I would argue was the most dominant he ever was, Cavendish won Sanremo in a sprint of 50 and a Tour stage with a climb of 14k at 4% at 17k to go in a sprint of 40. Prime Cavendish dealt with hills a lot better than later-career Cavendish and it's been memory-holed to an extent, to the point where people don't realise he would have been one of the favourites for things like the Tour stage Pedersen won last year had he been in his prime right now.Depends on what you base it on. I we took Cavendish of 2011, I think he would have won less these days - the routes have become tougher, and the speeds are higher, so he would have struggled on certain medium stages today.
In 2009, which I would argue was the most dominant he ever was, Cavendish won Sanremo in a sprint of 50 and a Tour stage with a climb of 14k at 4% at 17k to go in a sprint of 40. Prime Cavendish dealt with hills a lot better than later-career Cavendish and it's been memory-holed to an extent, to the point where people don't realise he would have been one of the favourites for things like the Tour stage Pedersen won last year had he been in his prime right now.
BTW, your signature is awesome!Also in Giro 2013 won a stage with an hilly last part, also this include a 15 km climb at 4 % that ended at less than 40 km from finish with many others small 4/5 % small climbs in the final
https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/giro-d-italia/2013/stage-13/info/profiles
ahah thank youBTW, your signature is awesome!
Sadly people outside of Italy won't get it...
Is that from Ponferrada?