Angliru said:
So you chose to ignore that one was in conditions that are normal in a standard race and the other was in conditions/terrain/roads that even the event itself deemed exceptional due to the extensive measures that were taken? Good for you. Pat yourself on the back for your intiative.
I disproved your arguement with logic, but it seems you are impervious to logic. So I gave in and followed your logic, giving an example that it is indeed simple and that indeed everyone always comes down one way or another. Even Tom Simpson came down, eventually. Yet you are still not satisfied even when I embrace your "logic"??
No seriously though I seem to remember many people on the forum complaining about Crostis descend being removed. I might be wrong, haven't gone back and looked it up, but my general impression is that most people were against it being removed and I was one of the only brave people to call it for what it was - just another epic Zomegnan fail. I don't know which side you stood on at the time - if you were always for the removal of Crostis then I salute you my fellow forumite. Once again though I believe at the time that was not the general consensus. I might be wrong though
LaFlorecita said:
Funny that the two that keep on arguing against this are the two biggest Schleck fans on this forum.
Arguing about descends is much easier then getting into philosophical debates about what constitutes truth, is there even such a thing as truth, are we not all liars in the end and where did that cow come from anyways. Just not that big on philosophy