Nederick said:
Maybe Shane could tangle with this guy?
Cyclist turned Driver Rager
One confused individual here.
Linked on that page is this story of a
female cyclist killed after getting doored and ending up underneath a truck. The case against the motorist who opened the door seems to hinge on the technicality that opening a door is not using a motor vehicle and that as the door didn't make contact with the cyclist, who successfully avoided it but unfortunately ended up under the wheels of a truck in the process, the motorist didn't cause the death of the woman after all. The witness seems a bit prejudiced as well, predicting the death of the woman moments before she was killed, as if her behaviour somehow deserved it.
The cyclist apparently was riding between stationary traffic to her right and parked vehicles to her left. Although this is the correct side to pass vehicles in NZ and countries such as Australia and GB, I personally don't sidle up between traffic to get to the front due to the possibility of being doored, also, as I'm part of the traffic, I behave like everyone else and wait behind a vehicle at lights. This is just me. Acting otherwise, however, doesn't give motorists a free pass to negligently maim or kill you: people in big steel death machines have a duty of care not to cause anyone else harm with said death machines, especially if their victims aren't ensconsed in the relative safety of their own big steel death machines.
But it seems people who ride bikes are less human than others in big, liberalised, post-Enlightenment Western nations and don't receive the same rights as others.
It seems that if cyclists aren't ending up underneath buses, they're metaphorically forced to ride at the back of them.