- May 19, 2010
- 115
- 0
- 0
In light of all the information coming out of the reasoned decision, and with the possibility of future actions/investigations that might result from it, do you think it would be in Contador's best interest to come clean now on any past doping offenses? While I haven't seen anything that specifically fingers him in what little of the material I've read, as a member of the Discovery Channel and Astana teams under Johan Brunyeel he's certainly on the fringes of a lot of this stuff. While he may not have been playing hardball the way LA/JB were, there's not much doubt he was in the game.
Would a confession now result in a lifetime ban for Contador? Or would it be handled differently since the doping occurred before the 2010 clenbuterol positive?
If he could come forward voluntarily and end up with a reduced ban (especially if it would be only a 6-month "offseason" ban like the USPS riders received), wouldn't that be better than having the spectre of the past hanging over him as the shield of Omerta is at least cracking and possibly crumbling?
There's a lot of talk of trying to move cycling forward to a new era. Wouldn't it be refreshing to see the (arguable) current leader of the professional peloton embrace that openness, rather than be the Chief of Omerta Enforcement as in the recent past?
I suppose Contador has to wait to see what, if anything, comes from the "truth and reconciliation commission" movement. If that solidifies into something real, he can probably just throw his hat in that ring along with everyone else. But if it doesn't pan out and he doesn't come clean on his own, I think he's going to spend the rest of his career looking over his shoulder, knowing that it could all come crashing down in a moment... and that's certainly not the best way to try to earn your place in cycling history.
Would a confession now result in a lifetime ban for Contador? Or would it be handled differently since the doping occurred before the 2010 clenbuterol positive?
If he could come forward voluntarily and end up with a reduced ban (especially if it would be only a 6-month "offseason" ban like the USPS riders received), wouldn't that be better than having the spectre of the past hanging over him as the shield of Omerta is at least cracking and possibly crumbling?
There's a lot of talk of trying to move cycling forward to a new era. Wouldn't it be refreshing to see the (arguable) current leader of the professional peloton embrace that openness, rather than be the Chief of Omerta Enforcement as in the recent past?
I suppose Contador has to wait to see what, if anything, comes from the "truth and reconciliation commission" movement. If that solidifies into something real, he can probably just throw his hat in that ring along with everyone else. But if it doesn't pan out and he doesn't come clean on his own, I think he's going to spend the rest of his career looking over his shoulder, knowing that it could all come crashing down in a moment... and that's certainly not the best way to try to earn your place in cycling history.