Taxus4a said:Well, I have read these days in this forum:
If Contador have his "form" he will beat Froome.
If Contador is like in Verbier or Etna he will win the Tour.
...
I think that those days have finished for him. So for me it is a little or naive or ridiculous that kind of statement.
That is like if I say: If Froome doped he will put some minutes from the second.
We have to consider this Tour as the era in wich we are, the situation of Contador after been banned and the SKy policy.
If there is a biopasport that has been progressively introduced and other kind of controls, if most of riders, including Contador, have reduced their performance, it is amazing for me people believe more the best people in the past, than the best people now.
I have always heard inside spanish world cycling, that yes, Contador dopes, but if there werent doping, he would be even better, becouse he is very talented. The same for Valverde.
I have always believe that, I even defended Contador when the judgement of his positive.
But now I have my doubts.. after Lance affair and Pepe Marti ban and the pressure with him after his own ban (and with all the pelotoon), he is one of the best riders of the world, while others leave cycling or reduce his results clearly, he has in these days won the Vuelta, a semiclasicc, and been in the podium with the best current riders in Oman or Tirreno,.. but, that, in fact, it is not that I have always heard: he would be better. He is not better, he is worse in result than before.
Of course I think he had nothing to do with Ulle, Lance, and those people in that strong doping era, but this era doesnt look the better for him as well.
If he dont win the Tour some people will say: he didnt found his better shape...and other did...well, dont joke.. he could have an excuse, but the most probably thing it is than in equal conditions there are better people for three weeks today, and maybe not only Froome.
I hope he will be strong in the Tour, he is a good contender, a passionate cyclist, a competitive rider that only mind to win. It would be very good for the race, but... IMO, consider Verbier as his normal shape or his normal clean performance, without taking it into question, it is a little bit annoyed and out of reality.
If SKY or Froome are cheaters, we will see in the future, but today the isnt any evidence, and his performance are into more credible values.
So, maybe we could not have the hole conclusion about who is better, Contador or Froome, in this Tour, but it is ridiculous to say that Contador is better becouse Froome cant performance like him in 2009 or other years.
Contador claims always he was clean in Tour 2010. Maybe it is true, it is hard to believe with a positive, but he wanst as strong than other times, and that is no so different as Froome last year IMO
You always believed that Contador, a man who went up a mountain faster than any cyclist in any Tour de France in history, could actually be BETTER WITHOUT DOPE??? a VAM of about 1864m/hr without being juiced??? A performance in most cases miles better than known dopers like Riis, Pantani, Ullrich and Armstrong?
I won't bother with the pejoratives...
http://www.sportsscientists.com/2009/07/tour-2009-contador-climb.html