Ok, I consider myself baited now...
1. I dont agree with the Livestrong foundation thing. Having survived cancer, and looking at all the various charities and organization that are supposed to help, Livestrong will be so nice to give you a folder with various information in it. When you need help in a variety of ways, like trying to cover expenses, losing your job, losing your way of life and a variety of other things that can happen that will ruin you if the cancer doesnt, all they provide is a folder with some info? Some charities might help with treatments, get you to the hospital, maybe some dr bills or prescriptions. Few will help protect you from getting fired, losing your health insurance or giving your family help for the future. Mind you I was not looking for a check to help me, but some resources that truly help a patient. I (my opinion here) feel Livestrong is useless.
2. I dont believe he is a good bike racer. He races one event, all other events that he might attempt, and as of late its few, he doesnt race. A bike racer tries all types of events, to use their skills, fitness and other tools to get to the finish line first. Regardless if its a Classic, TT, criterium or RR with 7 passes and 15,000 feet of climbing. You train to improve your weaknesses and compete. Racing only one event, and not really showing up other places is not my definition of a bike racer.
3. The grand tours are essentially a month long test of the human, and being a good bike racer. Not a test of drugs. The whole idea is after 20 days of racing, did you play your cards right to survive? He has made a mockery, along with others, that the drugs allow them to survive. One should suffer the day after winning a stage to try to hang on to those gains. Thats what the race is about.
4. Regardless of the doping charges, or whatever is due to happen in the coming months, the undertones, intimidation, egotistical, and a myriad of other terms that he has come to encompass is total nonsense. Put yourself on the line and let your results week in and week out speak for themselves. "Most tested rider" is a load of manure. Bike racing teaches humility. Winning one day can mean 3 weeks later being dropped like you were a beginner.
5. He is a jerk. I have raced against him in the 90's and prior to him having any finishes, he was a jerk. He is a jerk now, atleast that holds true.
6. I dont feel personally that the cancer diagnosis, prognostication, and follow up are correct on face value as we are led to believe. I might possibly believe testicular cancer. I feel more likely that a possible non cancerous legion on the brain might have occurred, perhaps from a program with a little T and some EPO prior to excellent care. Having been touched by cancer, with myself, my wife, and another dozen people I am acquainted with, the way treatment rips you to absolute shreds leads me to my conclusions.
7. Prior to cancer he was a World Champion. We can point to a number of people that are great one day racers, have a short list of palmares. Now all of a sudden, post cancer, he kills in the TdF? I find it unlikely without significant biological help in a synthetic form.
Okay, that is too much for now, I can keep going. Rip me to shreds, but these are my opinions, and if you feel you must, have at it.