The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ItalianJoe said:Neither the Schlecks nor Cancellara are using SRAM cranks or rings. http://www.cyclingnews.com/features...or-cancellara-and-the-schleck-brothers/129174
Look at the footage again. Andy wasn't even attempting a shift when the problem occurred. You can tell by the position of his hands compared to where they would need to be to make a shift using SRAM shifters. The kind of slippage that Schleck suffered is a chainring or frame flex issue, not a rear derailleur or cassette issue. As such, the problem here was Specialized, not SRAM.
The top areas for Specialized to check are probably chainring flex and tooth shape. Frame flex can cause the kind of issue Andy suffered too.
My take is that SRAM is covering for Specialized. Specialized buys a ton of SRAM parts, and SRAM doesn't want to point the finger at its good customer Specialized.
ItalianJoe said:Neither the Schlecks nor Cancellara are using SRAM cranks or rings. http://www.cyclingnews.com/features...or-cancellara-and-the-schleck-brothers/129174
Look at the footage again. Andy wasn't even attempting a shift when the problem occurred. You can tell by the position of his hands compared to where they would need to be to make a shift using SRAM shifters. The kind of slippage that Schleck suffered is a chainring or frame flex issue, not a rear derailleur or cassette issue. As such, the problem here was Specialized, not SRAM.
delbified said:pedal torque will rotate the bike anticlockwise, not clockwise as occurred here. the only feasible explanation for clockwise rotation (lifted rear wheel) is that the chain slipped (not jammed) and andy lurched forwards on the bars, applying a clockwise torque on the bike and lifting the rear wheel.
there's nothing propelling him forward. if the chain slipped, suddenly the opposing force that the pedal was applying would be removed and he would lurch forward. but if it jammed, that opposing force actually increases. there's no reason for him to lurch forward and lift the rear wheel in that circumstance.Polyarmour said:Disagree. If the chain jams at the rear cassette while Andy is pressing down on the pedals and leaning forward, the rear wheel will lift off the ground just as StyrbjornSterki has said.
it's obvious there was someone on the grassy knolldelbified said:do you think SRAM acted alone?
les95035 said:it's obvious there was someone on the grassy knoll
delbified said:there's nothing propelling him forward. if the chain slipped, suddenly the opposing force that the pedal was applying would be removed and he would lurch forward. but if it jammed, that opposing force actually increases. there's no reason for him to lurch forward and lift the rear wheel in that circumstance.
StyrbjornSterki said:There is no doubt ASchleck was shifting. Beyond the movement of the derailleur cage, Big GMaC posted a screen shot of the controls while ASchleck was executing the shift here.
It's highlighted to show the angle of the shift lever. That, my friends, is an upshift. While attacking, without soft-pedaling and while crosschaining.
This shows detail of ASchleck and Vino's BBs after the chain drop. Both are pretty radically crosschained but Vino had the good sense not to try to upshift under power in this condition.
EDIT:
Actually, I found a video at Velocenter of an interview with a SRAM rep. He states that ASchleck was in a 38x12 at the time of the mishap. A 38-t inner is possible with any BCD smaller than 135mm.