Andynonomous said:Prediction :
The LA fanboys will stay quiet for a while, then come back, and "argue away" all of the new allegations one at a time.
They are waiting for the Talking Points email from Public Strategies.
Andynonomous said:Prediction :
The LA fanboys will stay quiet for a while, then come back, and "argue away" all of the new allegations one at a time.
You're right - we had this guy who was on this forum and they kept come backing on posting crazy stuff- he went through about 100 usernames.TheComeBackKid said:I think you should be careful with some of the language. There are crazy people out there who might get the wrong idea. We're only talking about doping in the tour de france along with the rest winners of the last 20 years.
MacRoadie said:They are waiting for the Talking Points email from Public Strategies.
TheComeBackKid said:I think you should be careful with some of the language. There are crazy people out there who might get the wrong idea. We're only talking about doping in the tour de france along with the rest winners of the last 20 years.
Granville57 said:So it wan't like all the test data just disappeared, especially if there's still some damning evidence there. Is Catlin being implicated for complicity—because that would be a dark turn that I had never imagined—or is he being pointed to as the source of some of the unveiling?
Ugggh...so many lies, so little time!![]()
Yes - the Catlin stuff is very interesting - also wasn't it 1999 that the USAC was taken over by Wiesel & Co. - were they trying to find and hide LA's tests (as Caitlin would not know the numbers) becasue they knew what it contained?BroDeal said:The Catlin stuff sounds very fishy. Not only did test results disappear, but also B samples could not be confirmed two, possibly three, times. And the B samples that could not be confirmed were not on borderline results, which is the usual cause of a B sample differing from a A sample. On top of that it turns out that Catlin is a huge fan of Armstrong. What are the odds?
To make matters worse, "clean" teams like Slipstream used Catlin as the cornerstone of their supposed anti-doping programs.
The rug gets lifted and the cockroaches pour out.
In May 1999, USA Cycling sent a formal request to Catlin for past test results— specifically, testosterone-epitestosterone
ratios—for a cyclist identified only by his drug-testing code numbers.
notread said:Lance armstrong can go to hell.
180mmCrank said:Do we really need a photo of this guy on the forum? I'm not sure it ads anything.
T
MacRoadie said:They are waiting for the Talking Points email from Public Strategies.
Old School said:NOOOO! It can't be...he's our hero! He COULDN'T have cheated, because he's too good for that.
Yeah, he may be "Done" on the grill...but the chef is gonna forget about the steak and he's gonna burn right on up.
Either way, convicted or not, this isn't the way a so called "Great" would want to finish out his legacy...one tainted with so much stink that it makes a landfill smell sweet.![]()
BroDeal said:The Catlin stuff sounds very fishy. Not only did test results disappear, but also B samples could not be confirmed two, possibly three, times. And the B samples that could not be confirmed were not on borderline results, which is the usual cause of a B sample differing from a A sample. On top of that it turns out that Catlin is a huge fan of Armstrong. What are the odds?
To make matters worse, "clean" teams like Slipstream used Catlin as the cornerstone of their supposed anti-doping programs.
The rug gets lifted and the cockroaches pour out.
For me, Landis’s performance was just too good to be true. I remember looking at the proud American as he stood on the podium and thinking: “This is a doper.” And I remember frowning at his beaming coach: “And this is his sorcerer.”
“Where were you when you heard about the positive test?” I ask.
“I was back home in Boulder.”
“How did you hear of it?”
“Just like everyone else.”
“A news report?”
“Yeah.”
“What did you think?”
“I was totally floored: I was like, ‘Wow! Are you kidding me?’”
(Long pause.) “Go on,” I urge, “keep going. You say you were floored.”
“Yeah, I was very surprised.”
“Is that all?”
“Yeah, I mean I felt . . . eh . . . I was just very surprised, because it was totally unexpected. It would be the last thing I could ever dream of.”
Kimmage:
“That’s interesting,” I observe, “because it’s the first thing I would ever dream. Are you just incredibly naïve or am I just incredibly cynical?”
"I was in Morzine that afternoon and I couldn’t believe my eyes. I thought: ‘Landis is doping.’ And I looked at you [Lim] and thought: ‘And this is the guy who is giving him the drugs.’”
“I thought, ‘This is the latest crooked doctor on the block and what the sport needs now is to run these guys out.’”
Dr. Maserati said:Yes - the Catlin stuff is very interesting - also wasn't it 1999 that the USAC was taken over by Wiesel & Co. - were they trying to find and hide LA's tests (as Caitlin would not know the numbers) becasue they knew what it contained?
The article says Armstrong got it a couple of years before that, in the late 90s, so I figure it makes sense.Berzin said:If this drug was so difficult to get, and only used in clinical trials as intimated by the SI article, what was Dario Frigo doing with vials of the stuff in his bag in 2001?
So it seems that Armstrong wasn't the only one with access to this product.
This sort of pokes a hole in the theory that Armstrong had exclusive access to this experimental drug.
Someone please explain this to me just in case I have it wrong.
Berzin said:If this drug was so difficult to get, and only used in clinical trials as intimated by the SI article, what was Dario Frigo doing with vials of the stuff in his bag in 2001?
So it seems that Armstrong wasn't the only one with access to this product.
This sort of pokes a hole in the theory that Armstrong had exclusive access to this experimental drug.
Someone please explain this to me just in case I have it wrong.
Berzin said:If this drug was so difficult to get, and only used in clinical trials as intimated by the SI article, what was Dario Frigo doing with vials of the stuff in his bag in 2001?
Big Doopie said:<snip> in fact, it was clear to me that ferrari was probably a major reason pharmstrong returned. he convinced pharmstrong that he could get around the blood passport and could give him the advantage he needed over all the other riders.
don't you wonder why armstrong was so shocked that he ended up "only" third. and had so many sour grapes about it. And only recently mentioned again how surprised he was he didn't win an eighth tour.
<snip>
on3m@n@rmy said:Nice title... The snowball rolling downhill appears to be getting bigger.
frenchfry said:And articles like this in the mainstream press will also help others come out of the closet to tell the truth. Comfort in numbers.
Benotti69 said:well let's hope it starts a rats leaving a sinking ship sceanario and they can catch some of the rats and get them to talk like...well like rats of course![]()