False. Up until 2016 the race kind of sucked, but every edition from 2017 onwards was already very dynamic, and in fact Pogacar's first four attempts were all in the same vein as the editions in that period he didn't take part in.
That being said, Pogacar is arguably needed right now to give Alpecin a challenge.
I can't agree with you. The race was only dynamic in the last 15 minutes (before the Poggio), even Cipressa was known as the most overrated climb in the world because nothing happened there despite being close to the finish.
Normally, unpredictability (we don't know who will win) is the reason to defend MSR but this is a weak argument IMO. FW has been horrible for years and this year we will probably have one of the most open races this year because I can see more than 10 riders able to win it. Is the route okay? I don't think so. I think MSR is heavily influenced by Pogacar and he just masks how bad is the route.
Sprint classics/stages (TdF for example) are very unpredictable nowadays but are they exciting? I don't think so.
If we decided to invite people who don't follow cycling to watch MSR, would they be entertained by 15' of good racing in 6h? Again, I don't think so. Every other monument is unlocked in the last hour. In MSR, top riders are still riding at 150 watts with 40 km to the finish.
This is just my opinion and how I see cycling.