The current year-long standings are a joke. We need to bring back a classification system "à la Super Prestige Pernod". Who's with me????
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Panda Claws said:Isn't that the same as the ProTour but with different courses?
Panda Claws said:Isn't that the same as the ProTour but with different courses?
Mr. Gipsy said:The ProTour only includes the bigger races. The SPP included almost every race during the entire season (big and small).
Mambo95 said:No it didn't. For example, look at this http://www.raydobbins.com/derosa/pernod
Mr. Gipsy said:The ProTour only includes the bigger races. The SPP included almost every race during the entire season (big and small).
El Pistolero said:Seems like Fleche Wallonne was considered a "Monument" back then(I put it between brackets because they probably didn't refer to these races as Monuments back then) because it's bolded along with the 5 current Monuments, Bordeaux-Paris, the World Championship, GP des Nations and the Grand Tours. Never heard about Tours-Versailles though; I guess they mean Paris-Tours? Paris-Brussels also was very prestigious in the 70s it seems.
El Pistolero said:Never heard about Tours-Versailles though; I guess they mean Paris-Tours? Paris-Brussels also was very prestigious in the 70s it seems.
rghysens said:In the 70's and 80's Paris-Tours wace raced from Tours to somewhere near Paris.
That way they could design a final with a lot of hills in the Chevreuse valley, assuring "real champions" as winners. I think even Zoetemelk won Tours-Versailles once, so it was certainly not the flat race it is today.