The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Sniper, is near impossible to prove that you are clean no matter what. You almost need to give out some of your own money for appopiate testing to prove cleaningness because the sole UCI tests are not enough. And power numbers are not enough either. Not even close. Then you can start by promoting yourself as a clean rider, that you belong to bikepure and stuff, but those are just words.sniper said:it's gonna be fun also seeing posters who in other threads demand hard evidence before calling out a performance post names in here without any shred of evidence of cleanliness.
kittel's lie detector test was a nice try though.
LaFlorecita said:Contador passed a lie detector test tooI am confident he is clean now... I think so
![]()
Big Doopie said:Daniel Martin LBL. Perhaps the best win in pro cycling since the early 90s.
Andrew Talansky catching and dropping a fading Clentadoppucci on the last MTF of the tour, in one simple sequence reopening the debate over natural talent vs. O2 vector doping.
jens_attacks said:gotta be lance armstrong
Big Doopie said:Daniel Martin LBL. Perhaps the best win in pro cycling since the early 90s.
Andrew Talansky catching and dropping a fading Clentadoppucci on the last MTF of the tour, in one simple sequence reopening the debate over natural talent vs. O2 vector doping.
sublimit said:Going with a sprinter here with either the Gorilla, Cav or Bouhanni. GC clean riders possibly a kid like Pinot other than that who knows