Amen to you! Another person realizing what is going on.First of all, excuse my English, it isn´t my native language.
I've been reading you for a while, and this time I need to react to the undervaluation of what this rider is doing in specialized cycling. Van der Poel doesn't return to Strade Bianche or Liege this year, where he would have finished second and third, and Vingegaard doesn't compete in Liège or Lombardia every year.
Since Fignon any TDF winner competed in Roubaix. When Wiggins did it, he didn't have the Tour as his goal.
He did it by finishing second. Simply finishing in the top 10 would´ve been incredible.
Paris Roubaix is the one-day race where experience is most noticeable; without it, has come second. With experience, he'll do better. I think he will win Paris-Roubaix before San Remo
When I read this thread, it always struck me that the most critical ones are a Froome and Vingegaard fanatic. What would they have done in Roubaix?
And I don't understand why a Remco fan would criticize him. Remco acknowledged the difficulty of the cobblestones for him, and that should give value to what Pogacar did today. If you like Remco, you can't hate Pogacar. He's doing what was expected of Remco in these types of races, which, unfortunately, Remco hasn't dared to enter yet. Not even Milano San Remo. I don't understand why someone who goes and makes the podium is criticized by fans of riders who didn't dare. It's incredible to finish second without experience as a TDF rider.
Nothing is written about fanatism, but liking Froome, who was terrible on cobbles underestimating Pogacar for not winning the PR the first time around is certainly strange.
Edit: Remco can't do what Pogacar does at all. He would get murdered in RVV and specially PR.