I doubt he saw the last week of that race.He is almost implying Giro viewership was low due to Pogacar. What source did he use? Guess what, none. Why did he never speak about Vuelta 2023?
EDIT: Make that the last two weeks.
I doubt he saw the last week of that race.He is almost implying Giro viewership was low due to Pogacar. What source did he use? Guess what, none. Why did he never speak about Vuelta 2023?
I agree with you but NVH doesn't.P.s 2 "Viewing figures we high, so it wasn't boring" is a ridiculous take.
World Cup has a sky high figures, yet it doesn't mean every game is interesting.
Well, according to the logic of some fans in this thread, a 10:0 win in the World Cup final should be considered interesting because 3 billion people watched it, no?
Do you really consider that to be "Frustration turning to anger", rather than speculating that some people (apparently fewer than he estimated, but this was an interview, not a researched article) might have chosen not to watch?He is almost implying Giro viewership was low due to Pogacar. What source did he use? Guess what, none. Why did he never speak about Vuelta 2023?
What I am saying is a scenario like we saw in the Vuelta 2023 would not criticized by NVH and like @YavorD said, viewership is not a good indicator of quality so NVH's answer was silly.Do you really consider that to be "Frustration turning to anger", rather than speculating that some people (apparently fewer than he estimated, but this was an interview, not a researched article) might have chosen not to watch?
If he was asked about whether the 2025 Giro would be poorer than the 2024 event due to the absence of Pogacar, why on Earth would he mention the 2023 Vuelta??? How is that remotely a valid criticism of his comment?
It doesn't take much some places.Van Hooydonck speculating that viewership numbers might've been down a bit because Pogacar was dominating last years Giro is a brutal indictment of pure anger. I hope he gets charged for hate speech and thrown in jail. I've rarely ever seen such levels of disrespect in competitive sport.
Great comments, thoughtful. He makes the good point that in his opinion, it's the "right" of Roglic to be positioned to win. And history is history. Visma, the media all said Sepp was coming of age and that the win was deserved and not gifted.A interview with NVH when he said there wasn't a bad team environment and blamed the media for that. Do you really think he is impartial in his assessments? I don't think so.
View: https://youtube.com/shorts/TtIjxrzqyS0?si=9G1cks1udLYJu-Es
What you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.What I am saying is a scenario like we saw in the Vuelta 2023 would not criticized by NVH and like @YavorD said, viewership is not a good indicator of quality so NVH's answer was silly.
For you his words were ok, for some his words were not ok, lets move on.. wtfWhat you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.
Perfectly fair to say that his answers in this interview were silly. I'm still waiting for the justification for saying that they were hateful, disrespectful and angry.
But I don't think that is going to be forthcoming from those that said it.
I have nothing to do with that.What you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.
Perfectly fair to say that his answers in this interview were silly. I'm still waiting for the justification for saying that they were hateful, disrespectful angel angry.
But I don't think that is going to be forthcoming from those that said it.
I know that that wasn't you: that's why I said "from those that said it. "I have nothing to do with that.
I have no problem with them not liking what he said: I do care that, in a forum I have respect for, people make accusations that they are apparently unwilling or unable to defend.For you his words were ok, for some his words were not ok, lets move on.. wtf
It was just super disrespectful. He should be ashamed of his comments.Van Hooydonck speculating that viewership numbers might've been down a bit because Pogacar was dominating last years Giro is a brutal indictment of pure anger. I hope he gets charged for hate speech and thrown in jail. I've rarely ever seen such levels of disrespect in competitive sport.
Wait a minute, I'm smelling some incoherence here. Where are you defending Pogacar when some posters go wild against Pogacar calling him a "clown", a "disgrace to this sport", "worse than Armstrong"?I have no problem with them not liking what he said: I do care that, in a forum I have respect for, people make accusations that they are apparently unwilling or unable to defend.
If they are willing and able to defend such accusations, then it's fully consistent.Wait a minute, I'm smelling some incoherence here. Where are you defending Pogacar when some posters go wild against Pogacar calling him a "clown", a "disgrace to this sport", "worse than Armstrong"?
Isn't this disrespectful?
So NVH lying or just not having any facts for his claims is somehow okay?If they are willing and able to defend such accusations, then it's fully consistent.
Pogaclown is the most common at clinic… no one got ban for thisWait a minute, I'm smelling some incoherence here. Where are you defending Pogacar when some posters go wild against Pogacar calling him a "clown", a "disgrace to this sport", "worse than Armstrong"?
Isn't this disrespectful?
So are you telling me there are proofs that Pogacar is a clown (for example)?If they are willing and able to defend such accusations, then it's fully consistent.
That does not follow from what I wrote. If I accuse Pogi of being a clown, I can defend that accusation without a proof.So are you telling me there are proofs that Pogacar is a clown (for example)?
Not the point I was making at all. Please stop with the strawmen.So NVH lying or just not having any facts for his claims is somehow okay?
Yes, it's fully okay whatever he does. Why should I care? He isn't a poster here, right?So NVH lying or just not having any facts for his claims is somehow okay?