Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 1212 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I get what you are saying but lets me ask, without Pogacar how entertaining would MSR, RVV, P-R and Amstel be this year without Pogacar? Maybe they would be great, but we have seen one big race (E3) this year where MvDP raced without Pogacar and it ended with MvDP 50km solo attack. Without Pogacar going to those races it would be pretty boring and he saved whole spring season with his participations.
And Tadej has been beaten in races by unexpected competition. The fact that he has beaten Remco after much Belgian anticipation suggests maybe that country tunes Tadej out. Sorry for the bad news, fans. It is still worth watching.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
That is not "frustration ...turning into anger": it is a suggestion that many people prefer more competitive racing. If I say that I preferred watching the cyclocross events that Van Der Poel was not winning by a hug margin, that is not "frustration ...turning into anger", it is an opinion about what makes for good entertainment.
He is almost implying Giro viewership was low due to Pogacar. What source did he use? Guess what, none. Why did he never speak about Vuelta 2023?
 
P.s 2 "Viewing figures we high, so it wasn't boring" is a ridiculous take.
World Cup has a sky high figures, yet it doesn't mean every game is interesting.
Well, according to the logic of some fans in this thread, a 10:0 win in the World Cup final should be considered interesting because 3 billion people watched it, no?
I agree with you but NVH doesn't.
 
He is almost implying Giro viewership was low due to Pogacar. What source did he use? Guess what, none. Why did he never speak about Vuelta 2023?
Do you really consider that to be "Frustration turning to anger", rather than speculating that some people (apparently fewer than he estimated, but this was an interview, not a researched article) might have chosen not to watch?

If he was asked about whether the 2025 Giro would be poorer than the 2024 event due to the absence of Pogacar, why on Earth would he mention the 2023 Vuelta??? How is that remotely a valid criticism of his comment?
 
Overall, Giro 2023 was better then Giro 2024. In term of racing and drama till the very end. Višarje is something that we will remember forever and up until that point the overall winner was not leading. It has the Tour 2020 vibes, another race that we will remember forever.

As for Pogi and his Giro win in terms of what will remain memorable on the long run is mostly domination. And even here Giro doesn't really stand out as the whole Pogi era is the same and hence you don't have to single Giro out. In terms of drama and stuff. So from historical point of view what will remain is recognition of successful attempt on when it comes to Giro-Tour double. And that is rather splendid if you ask me.
 
Do you really consider that to be "Frustration turning to anger", rather than speculating that some people (apparently fewer than he estimated, but this was an interview, not a researched article) might have chosen not to watch?

If he was asked about whether the 2025 Giro would be poorer than the 2024 event due to the absence of Pogacar, why on Earth would he mention the 2023 Vuelta??? How is that remotely a valid criticism of his comment?
What I am saying is a scenario like we saw in the Vuelta 2023 would not criticized by NVH and like @YavorD said, viewership is not a good indicator of quality so NVH's answer was silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
A interview with NVH when he said there wasn't a bad team environment and blamed the media for that. Do you really think he is impartial in his assessments? I don't think so.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/TtIjxrzqyS0?si=9G1cks1udLYJu-Es
Great comments, thoughtful. He makes the good point that in his opinion, it's the "right" of Roglic to be positioned to win. And history is history. Visma, the media all said Sepp was coming of age and that the win was deserved and not gifted.
Kuss was ready to take on bigger roles in leadership. The sound of crickets, Kuss has just not showed up, instead of leadership, his role as important lieutenant has been diminished. He is currently a non factor. And with crash calamity that is Jonas's recent racing, it would have been great for Visma to have proven powerful Primoz..
Jorgenson trying unsuccessfully to fill the void of the two leaders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oldman
What I am saying is a scenario like we saw in the Vuelta 2023 would not criticized by NVH and like @YavorD said, viewership is not a good indicator of quality so NVH's answer was silly.
What you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.

Perfectly fair to say that his answers in this interview were silly. I'm still waiting for the justification for saying that they were hateful, disrespectful and angry.

But I don't think that is going to be forthcoming from those that said it.
 
Last edited:
What you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.

Perfectly fair to say that his answers in this interview were silly. I'm still waiting for the justification for saying that they were hateful, disrespectful and angry.

But I don't think that is going to be forthcoming from those that said it.
For you his words were ok, for some his words were not ok, lets move on.. wtf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What you were complaining about was him not citing the 2023 Vuelta when it had nothing to do with what he was asked. If he is asked about it, you might get his take on whether that was a good watch.

Perfectly fair to say that his answers in this interview were silly. I'm still waiting for the justification for saying that they were hateful, disrespectful angel angry.

But I don't think that is going to be forthcoming from those that said it.
I have nothing to do with that.
 
I have no problem with them not liking what he said: I do care that, in a forum I have respect for, people make accusations that they are apparently unwilling or unable to defend.
Wait a minute, I'm smelling some incoherence here. Where are you defending Pogacar when some posters go wild against Pogacar calling him a "clown", a "disgrace to this sport", "worse than Armstrong"?
Isn't this disrespectful?
 
If they are willing and able to defend such accusations, then it's fully consistent.
So NVH lying or just not having any facts for his claims is somehow okay?

Speaking for "fans" in general, with very few people agreeing with him. How does he have the nerve to speak for so many?

And then his own history racing against Pog...

How is he credible? Where are people wrong for calling this out?

He is talking out of his ass with his comments and he just comes off bitter. Purposefully trying to speak bad about someone. He should get a lot of backlash for what he said and rightfully so.