- Mar 20, 2022
- 13,174
- 17,973
- 22,180
Everything is going perfect for the double. Even the weather is helping Tadej this year.
To be fair, he has won two Tours. At any rate, he is 1-2 kg lighter, so that's 2-4 secs faster each km uphill. I'm aware Vingegaard has generated superior power the last two Tours, but I'm curious to see where this Pogi stands come July.[content deleted]
They're not comparable at all. Especially not in how it affects the race.I thought Sean Kelly was OTT today talking about Pog being greedy. He was on two wins. I look forward to hearing him criticise Jonathan Milan when he has his team chasing with 2 or 3 wins already in the bag.
Netserk's response is wrong. In the Giro Nibali does it in 2013 (okay the stage between the (M)TT and Tre Cime was cancelled but it's still back-to-back).Incredible that Alaphilippe of all people have been closest to that since![]()
I wrote:Netserk's response is wrong.
For the Tour:
I wrote
I know, but why would the tour mate when Pogacar is riding the Giro and both Basso and Nibali (if you want to count him) are more recent than Armstrong?I wrote:
Well I guess it will just not make any sense when Pog wins both the Giro and the Tour this year then 😁Normally the objetive Double is a goal, when a rider won in the previous year the Tour de France and then he wants a new and more difficult challenge in the next year.
It doesn't make sense when you can't even win just the Tour.
But in terms of "propaganda" is good, especially for the sponsors.
I always find itI thought Sean Kelly was OTT today talking about Pog being greedy. He was on two wins. I look forward to hearing him criticise Jonathan Milan when he has his team chasing with 2 or 3 wins already in the bag.
But that's not really the case. Kelly's generation had a more ballanced approach, in that if you grabbed all the spoils eventually you made enemies. And Kelly isn't the only one from that era who says so. Maybe that's no longer the case today.I always find itstrangewhen retired racers criticize current pros for doing exactly what they would have done in their career.
OK, I don't really mean strange, I mean lame.
I don't think he'll win many more stages. From now on the breakaways will have a much better chance to stay away. Today was such an easy chance to grab one more with only a brief effort.He’s at his normal 3 wins per GT already and not even to the first rest day.
Days like today showed he can easily win with minimal energy expenditure, so how many will he take overall?
Obviously depends on his team’s ability to control the race but I don’t think 6 wins would be out of the question even if riding defensively. Will being that much of a cannibal be a bad look though?
Actually, your post is not really the case, but its irrelevant so I'll leave it at that.But that's not really the case. Kelly's generation had a more ballanced approach, in that if you grabbed all the spoils eventually you made enemies. And Kelly isn't the only one from that era who says so. Maybe that's no longer the case today.
Anyone who is on top will have "enemies" though. Everybody is not gonna like you or be your friend. It comes with the territory of being the guy everyone wants to beat.But that's not really the case. Kelly's generation had a more ballanced approach, in that if you grabbed all the spoils eventually you made enemies. And Kelly isn't the only one from that era who says so. Maybe that's no longer the case today.
"Competitive" zone two training continues. Cruise control from start to finish. As far as double attempts go this is the most promising start I have seen in a long time. He doesn't need to dig deep to win stages and just has to follow 2-3 guys for the rest of the race.
Nobody is talking about gifting anything and Kelly's 159 wins comes in an era of 160 days of racing per year. Let's be real. The issue is leaving guys out of contract today.Anyone who is on top will have "enemies" though. Everybody is not gonna like you or be your friend. It comes with the territory of being the guy everyone wants to beat.
Kelly won 159 races. I feel like it is a bit hypocritical from him to say that as well.
Today is also a bad example. UAE had worked all day and for Pog to not contest the sprint when the win for the stage was up for grabs would have been criminal. Would have made zero sense to "gift" a win here.
There is no reason to gift anything to a rival... unless they have helped you pull away from other riders and in return increasing/keeping your lead of a race or securing the win overall because of it. You strike a deal.
Gifting it to a teammate as a thank you for doing an awesome job works fine as well.
Other type of "gifts" to appease people that is gonna hate anyways... nah. Thats lame. They are more likely to turn on you than returning the favor.
Developing depression while winning the giro, riding in pink each day and picking up mountain sprint stage wins would be a new low for human resilienceInteresting dilemma, keep the character and stay true to yourself through the rest of the race and by doing so likely to affect Tour performance or do something that doesn't come easy to you and risk depression.
Long two weeks ahead.
Nothing? Ever? Thats some pretty confident forecasts considering Vingo '23 was fighting a clearly recovering Pogacar.Vingo ‘23 is the greatest ever human performance on a bicycle. Nothing pogi does will ever surpass that
But it was the working part he had issue with. Once it was brought together of course Pog was gonna go for it, and nobody said he shouldn't as far as I can tell.Today is also a bad example. UAE had worked all day and for Pog to not contest the sprint when the win for the stage was up for grabs would have been criminal. Would have made zero sense to "gift" a win here.
Kelly hasn't seen a racer with this variety of skills in awhile, either. Sean raced like a mercenary because he had to win to make money. Pogacar has a fatter contract and what he's winning in this GT is what he wants to win. There's still almost two weeks to go. It'll be interesting to see how UAE navigates the larger goal.But that's not really the case. Kelly's generation had a more ballanced approach, in that if you grabbed all the spoils eventually you made enemies. And Kelly isn't the only one from that era who says so. Maybe that's no longer the case today.