I'm just a little bit surprised because he never did this before.Maybe a little rest and then intensity training til dauphine. I think they know how to do.
I'm just a little bit surprised because he never did this before.Maybe a little rest and then intensity training til dauphine. I think they know how to do.
Of course and I'm pretty sure Del Toro cannot be so good in every terrain like Pogacar. From what I see in TTs, he doesn't have an incredible engine to fight for MSR, RVV and PR.Guys like Pogacar only come every few decades. I dont understand why people expect every new guy perfoming well to be the next Pogacar.
It is of course possible, but statistically it is very unlikely that we have a new Pogacar within the next 20 years at least.
Vermeersch is here. He's going to the Tour?They are all there bar Pogacar. Maybe he will return in 2/3 days.
Login • Instagram
Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world.www.instagram.com
There is also a guy (with glasses) looking to the camera and I don't know who he is (Rune?).Vermeersch is here. He's going to the Tour?
Soler drops Wout in every mountain stage. I'm not worried.The main point from today is again van Aert. If he keeps improving his shape he will be a real menace for UAE in the Tour.
He is. They gave him leadership but soon we saw he didn't have it.Adam Yates is definitely a domestique at the Giro.
He helped Ayuso after Ayuso dropped.
For this, it would have been better if he hadn't gone to the Giro.
I think Van Aert isn't at his best; the problem is that there are many who are even worse than him.Soler drops Wout in every mountain stage. I'm not worried.
Double standards. Remember how Hincapie was crying when Pogacar destroyed Jonas and Matteo on Isola 2000.The main point for today is seeing everybody happy about Pedersen 4 stage wins. On the otger hand, some teams criticized Pogacar for being too greedy. If I was UAE, I would not let the break sniff a single stage in the Tour.
Seems reasonable to be bothered by a rider dominating the race so that there's no GC suspense left, versus a sprinter or sprinter+++ winning stages and not threatening the overall in any way.Double standards. Remember how Hincapie was crying when Pogacar destroyed Jonas and Matteo on Isola 2000.
Of course they have double standards. Last year they were crying and telling him not to win any more stages in the Giro. This year they're not saying anything to Pedersen.Double standards. Remember how Hincapie was crying when Pogacar destroyed Jonas and Matteo on Isola 2000.
Seems reasonable to be bothered by a rider dominating the race so that there's no GC suspense left, versus a sprinter or sprinter+++ winning stages and not threatening the overall in any way.
Not sure I get the parallel people keep drawing here. Sprinters win a lot of stages in GC's we've seen dominant sprinters in every era. Mads is obviously more than a sprinter, but the overall vibe is the same.
The GC remains exciting. Pogi dominating stages kills the race. Unless you're a huge Pogi fan, then it's fantastic!
Of course it's fantastic. I have no problem with Mads winning 10 stages. I also want him to destroy the Vuelta field later in the year as well. I enjoy watching dominating performances.Seems reasonable to be bothered by a rider dominating the race so that there's no GC suspense left, versus a sprinter or sprinter+++ winning stages and not threatening the overall in any way.
Not sure I get the parallel people keep drawing here. Sprinters win a lot of stages in GC's we've seen dominant sprinters in every era. Mads is obviously more than a sprinter, but the overall vibe is the same.
The GC remains exciting. Pogi dominating stages kills the race. Unless you're a huge Pogi fan, then it's fantastic!
Because breakaway riders are not getting any chance of winning in this Giro and Lidl is partly responsible for that. Are they gonna cry like they did in GTs where Pogacar was dominating and didn't let (he did sometimes) the break wins?Seems reasonable to be bothered by a rider dominating the race so that there's no GC suspense left, versus a sprinter or sprinter+++ winning stages and not threatening the overall in any way.
Not sure I get the parallel people keep drawing here. Sprinters win a lot of stages in GC's we've seen dominant sprinters in every era. Mads is obviously more than a sprinter, but the overall vibe is the same.
The GC remains exciting. Pogi dominating stages kills the race. Unless you're a huge Pogi fan, then it's fantastic!
Furthermore, Bardet complained last year that breaks weren't being allowed to win.Of course it's fantastic. I have no problem with Mads winning 10 stages. I also want him to destroy the Vuelta field later in the year as well. I enjoy watching dominating performances.
My problem is with crying about it when a GC rider does it.
Tomorrow Lidl will try again and no one will complain. I also think riders can win how many stages they want so if teams want to win, they should go crazy to achieve their goalsFurthermore, Bardet complained last year that breaks weren't being allowed to win.
The day Carapaz win, it was LIDL that prevented the breakaway from winning. Today, LIDL was also one of the teams that made the most effort to prevent the breakaway from winning.
I don't care if Pedersen wins 6 or 21 stages. It's professional sport; he has to win every one he can and wants to compete.
What matters is the double standard.
Again, the parallel between not giving the break a chance on a sprint stage, and a rider totally dominating the GC and swallowing the break on key mountain stages to the point of making the race boring isn’t one I see. Or rather they’re meaningfully different, and quite easy to see where someone would be bummed about one and not the other.Because breakaway riders are not getting any chance of winning in this Giro and Lidl is partly responsible for that. Are they gonna cry like they did in GTs where Pogacar was dominating and didn't let (he did sometimes) the break wins?
And keep the same narrative when Remco wins/dominates a GT (I don't think it will ever happen though).
That’s totally fine, some folks like domination, others don’t.Of course it's fantastic. I have no problem with Mads winning 10 stages. I also want him to destroy the Vuelta field later in the year as well. I enjoy watching dominating performances.
My problem is with crying about it when a GC rider does it.
You may have missed “sprinter+++++” or my comment than "Mads is more than just a sprinter". Obviously I’m making a distinction.Pedersen isn't just a sprinter. He's won two stages that other riders could´ve won.
That's what happens when they have double standards.
I don't have a dog in the fight, or better said I don't hold it against Pog (going for so many stage wins), but it's kind of a different ball-park when you are the guy who is winning multiple GT's GCs.The main point for today is seeing everybody happy about Pedersen 4 stage wins. On the other hand, some teams criticized Pogacar for being too greedy. If I was UAE, I would not let the break sniff a single stage in the Tour.
GC and stage wins against PC (points) and stage wins. There is hardly any difference IMHO.I don't have a dog in the fight, or better said I don't hold it against Pog (going for so many stage wins), but it's kind of a different ball-park when you are the guy who is winning multiple GT's GCs.
You cannot compare, idk, Indurain with Zabel.