All of that is true. There’s still the claim for doses that burn out by testing (and the other irregularities also?). Tacit agreements on possible action between teams and governing bodies seem still the most direct, but there must be other discrete factors.
On a trivial note, Bruyneel has been floating his possession of evidence around the credibility of LeMond’s claimed VO2max. (Not that I care for either of them.)
This is a little old, but the Covid era candidness may make it a little more current
“But wada’s numbers reflect only those who get caught. David Howman, once wada’s chief operating officer, says he thinks the real figure in elite sports might be more than one in ten—which would imply that over 90% of dopers were getting away with it. By and large, he says, only the “dopey dopers” get caught…
Most new drugs, though, are created by the pharmaceutical industry. Selective androgen receptor modulators (sarms) are experimental drugs intended to provide similar benefits to aas, but with fewer side-effects. Researchers hope they will help treat muscle-wasting diseases. But sarms have attracted sporting interest too. Oliver Catlin runs the Banned Substances Control Group, an American firm which tests sports supplements for forbidden drugs. He points out that although more than a dozen sarms are in development, tests exist for only a few of them, and only at the most advanced laboratories.“
Between 10% and 40% of athletes in Tokyo might be cheating
www.economist.com
I think I raised this a little while ago: the issue of a niche market shift toward the development of substances that dissolve more quickly.