- Jul 16, 2024
- 2,002
- 2,216
- 6,680
You probably do have to wonder whether such a high cadence actually makes sense physically.
While being French myself, I don't know who the 'French people' you're talking about are. In France you're allowed to have and express different opinions, you know?It is also good thing for Pogi, Seixas being so good but so young-so at least French people will stop with doping accusations. I mean you can't say anything against Pog, if there is a teenager who is already having almost same numbers as Tadej.
This is the mystery (at least for me). And it’s his party piece, along with the ability to sustain the higher speed (thereby indicating that he doesn’t go into oxygen debt, that he has no red zone that means he has to pay for the effort soon after). He’s on a steep climb, at the end of the race. Vingegaard is setting a pretty high pace already. The context is interesting and relevant I think. Energy state, fatigue etc. And despite that context Pogacar, just appears to ‘flick a switch’ and accelerates away. Sprints in fact. It doesn’t pass the eye test, at least for myself. It literally looks like a guy not so much with just a bigger oxygen tank (as say EPO would provide) gradually putting distance into an opponent , than a guy on an e-bike who has hit the power button. Because otherwise where is the additional power coming from? Switching to a bigger gear and upping the cadence would be the only way that he gaps Vingegaard over that relatively short distance. But is that possible on such a slope at the end of a brutal stage? How does he generate the additional power without at least getting off the saddle? And even then where does he get the instant energy to accelerate away like that? In this case I note Jonas giving a rueful shake of his head just before he crosses the line. Disappointment perhaps, but also I think a certain level of incredulity.You probably do have to wonder whether such a high cadence actually makes sense physically.
Armstrong was a bully in general, even towards his ex-teammates or ex-coworkers. That's why he was penalized in such a brutal way (not just for doping). Pogacar is more like a nice guy type and it seems a lot of cyclists from other teams genuinely like him (not just respect him, as in case of Armstrong). Human aspect is very important and Pogacar excels in that.
Did you bother to make some calculations?View: https://x.com/ImCalledPikachu/status/1948406756469531092?s=20
just a normal froome acceleration
All the training videos by UAE and Pogacar say that they do adaptive training..funny how Tadej is recognized as one of the best cyclists ever, hundreds of videos from different sources of him obviously doing some kind of interval structured training, most riders interviewed, including one I am fairly familiar with, Isaac Del Toro, all have said that when they adopted some part or Pogacar training tips, they improved.Older riders who had success like Tim Wellens, now 34, Rafal Majka, stepped away at 35, Nils Politt, 32 all say that they have achieved marginal, yet noticeable gains from doing UAE- Pogacar style training..That's 3 guys with 40+ years of high level racing and training experience that say they have seen improvements. You also hear positive things from other teams, with aged riders who claim that while they thought they had seen, heard or thought they knew just about everything, but turned out they could still learn something new, benefit after 10+ years racing.Can anyone explain Tadej's apparent immunity to oygen debt? I keep mentioning it but no one, even his fanboys, has ever provided a reasonable explanation. Setting aside the brutal seated accelerations (which need their own explanation), how can Pogi just keep going? Everything we see from other riders (even Vingegaard) is that they ultimately pay for periods of enhanced effort on long inclines and especially at high elevations. I watched cycling in the 2010s. The red zone was a thing. A rider jumped away to gap the group, but then very quickly had to knock off the higher effort as the oxygen levels suffered in reaction. Hence the close races and the smallish gaps. We still see it in the rest of the peloton, but Uncle Mauro's top rider doesn't appear encumbered by this law of nature.
The UAE PR machine is trying to hide the obvious by trying to convince people that Pogacar uses some "special" training method.Many posts in the clinic are scary, frightening. People have some crazy Ozempic thinking, skip all logic like eating right, exercise, expert advice from doctors, nutritionists, coaches.. No all logical steps are skipped over and utter entitlement takes over, I accomplished all steps, all the hard work with a pill or easy injection. People portray Pogacar as unethical, immoral because he does not disclose his every action, down to medical, nutrition, bathroom habits. Nobody was mad at Col. Sanders for not publishing the secret recipe at Kentucky Fried Chicken but Pogacar is commanded that he lay everything, I mean everything out for some attempt at absolute transparency.
For many a camera crew following him around 24\7, his Strava, power meter, medical records, everything be made public.
Easy posts like, it's drugs, it's a conspiracy, it's a motor.. All made with a period or !.
Easy, fast, no data, motors are used according to who? Pogacar is on a program according to who?
Not where is the fire..no..start with where is the smoke?
Guy racing throughout the world and tested everywhere and nothing.. For years, zip, nada. I get the frustration but accusing people of serious, serious crimes is done far too easily.
How are people not including the dozens and dozens of hours of Pogacar and coaches, staff explaining to the degree that they can, how and why they are successful.
"I want to believe" as written on Mulder's poster in the X-files.How come so many people have the memory of a goldfish?
Sound familiar?... a multifaceted plan of strengthening, bicycling, and eating--so strong and so effective that it created history.
How are these two things related?Btw Peter Attia is mentioned over 1700 times in the epstein files.He might not be the best person to turn to for explanations of inhuman performances.
Yeah, I mean it's not like cycling doesn't have a long and ignominious history as regards cheating. Those of us who are sceptical, perhaps downright incredulous, are not therefore suggesting something is happening that is unprecedented, that is unheard of, that is unthinkable. That's not to suggest that because what happened in the past we simply assume it is happening now, or that 'they're all at it'. However, when it comes to this situation, we have further contextual information we can consider. For example, the history of the two individuals who run the team Pogacar is employed by. We also have performance data from the pre-Pogacar decade to compare with, a period of relative stability as regards cyclists performance levels. Given the subsequent outlandish performance levels of Pogacar in comparison to a peloton that has gotten remarkably faster since 2019, in addition to the overall historical context, it is therefore *more than reasonable*, to question these incredible performances and associated remarkable, some might say unprecedented, levels of consistency. Suggesting otherwise, that this is all just silly, just isn't a credible argument.Oh man....these people would still believe Lance Armstrong if he came back now "oh I just did some Pogacar training and nutrition, look at me now i'm so fast"
Dudes, they improve because of a new thing. Give it 15 years and we will know what that thing was. I can tell you right away it's not nutrition and it's not training.
How come so many people have the memory of a goldfish?
Pogacar is on a program according to some people in and around Monaco. People talk and people do even more talk when they are drunk in fancy restaurants. According to them Pogacar will become even better.
If that can't be answered without breaking the no politics rule, please don't answer it.How are these two things related?
If it can't, then that statement should be deleted, no?If that can't be answered without breaking the no politics rule, please don't answer it.
The comment of itself isn't breaking any rules: just a bit of an enigma.If it can't, then that statement should be deleted, no?
What if DONCA were to say "I can't answer that without breaking the no politics rule."?The comment of itself isn't breaking any rules: just a bit of an enigma.
Mentioning the name Epstein is not in and of itself political, and no political controversy has been entered into. I don't think that allusion is causing any raising of political hackles on the forum.What if DONCA were to say "I can't answer that without breaking the no politics rule."?
Then why bother intervening at all? I'm sure DONCA is already aware of the no politics rule.Mentioning the name Epstein is not in and of itself political, and no political controversy has been entered into. I don't thing that allusion is causing any raising of political hackles on the forum.
