TDF 2018 Stage 4 - La Baule - Sarzeau 195 km

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Who will win this stage?

  • Fernando Gaviria

    Votes: 36 40.9%
  • Peter Sagan

    Votes: 13 14.8%
  • Dylan Groenewegen

    Votes: 17 19.3%
  • Marcel Kittel

    Votes: 10 11.4%
  • Arnaud Demare

    Votes: 2 2.3%
  • Sonny Colbrell

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • Mark Cavendish

    Votes: 3 3.4%
  • Andre Greipel

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Alexander Kristoff

    Votes: 1 1.1%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 2.3%

  • Total voters
    88
Re: Re:

rainman said:
Screecher said:
Amazinmets87 said:
Screecher said:
tobydawq said:
He speaks English pretty well.

And very snobbish comment by the way. Why not learn Spanish if you want to understand what Spanish talking people say?
It was the winner's interview. I feel like English should be spoken but that's just me.
Is cycling a traditionally English speaking sport? The paradigm may have shifted in recent decades, but 20 years ago I'd bet more cycling fans spoke Spanish as their first language.
I don't mind them using their own language but they should also do interviews in English. One in their own language and one in English.
How do you figure that out? They can express themselves more clearly in their own language and translation is provided. What an entitled snob.

actually, I remember Sagan giving his interview in Slovak in live on Eurosport. Then, when everybody was surprised, I think the explanation was, that national tv have precedence for making the interview( I am not sure if it is paid, that would explain why it happened only once). Maybe that was the case today too.
 
Re:

Zinoviev Letter said:
The silly part of this discussion is the assumption among some that teams go to all the trouble of assembling a sprint support team, paying them, drilling them, picking them for race squads and putting them to work all for no reason because ultimately the guy who is just the fastest wins.
Of course it matters, but some people come off as incredibly butthurt.

So if you get dropped off with a great leadout, you basically can't win, can you? People downplay the win to a laughable extent and point towards Kittel and Groenewegen as faster guys. COME ON.
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
Pasqualon has ridden a solid Tour so far, pretty good for a 3rd rate sprinter who's probably more of a one day racer.
 
Re: Re:

rainman said:
Screecher said:
Amazinmets87 said:
tobydawq said:
Screecher said:
Not a fan of riders that don't bother to learn english. No idea what's Gaviria saying.

He speaks English pretty well.

And very snobbish comment by the way. Why not learn Spanish if you want to understand what Spanish talking people say?
It was the winner's interview. I feel like English should be spoken but that's just me.
Is cycling a traditionally English speaking sport? The paradigm may have shifted in recent decades, but 20 years ago I'd bet more cycling fans spoke Spanish as their first language.
I don't mind them using their own language but they should also do interviews in English. One in their own language and one in English.
How do you figure that out? They can express themselves more clearly in their own language and translation is provided. What an entitled snob.[/quote]
Most of Movistar's riders don't speak English. If you want to talk to Valverde in winner's circle and you speak English, you'd better have a translator or you aren't doing an interview. That pretty much goes a good majority of that team. You want someone to speak English on that team you've got Amador and Landa and that's really it for an interview. You want to know what they're saying learn Spanish. Also Gaviria's English is much improved over last year. It's an international sport, don't expect them all to know English, it's not a requirement. (Valverde does know enough English to communicate with his fans that don't speak Spanish and with riders in the peloton that don't speak Spanish, but that is the extent of his use of English.)
 
Re:

dusty red roads said:
What's going on with Kittel? Is it form or because of his team?
I'd say a little of both. His team is definitely not as strong or organized as he's had but he's also not on the tip top form he's had in the past. Everyone at their best Kittel is very likely the fastest but him being slightly off his best means he's at about the same level as a bunch of other guys like Groenewegen, Sagan, Gav, Greipel, etc...so stuff like team strength, positioning, and wheel surfing ability comes into play even more.
 
Re: Re:

Valv.Piti said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
The silly part of this discussion is the assumption among some that teams go to all the trouble of assembling a sprint support team, paying them, drilling them, picking them for race squads and putting them to work all for no reason because ultimately the guy who is just the fastest wins.
Of course it matters, but some people come off as incredibly butthurt.

So if you get dropped off with a great leadout, you basically can't win, can you? People downplay the win to a laughable extent and point towards Kittel and Groenewegen as faster guys. COME ON.

I agree that there’s often a bit of biased axe grinding going on in these discussions, but I really don’t see how anyone can draw conclusions about the speed of, say, Gaviria v Kittel v Groenewegen at the moment when we haven’t seen them in anything remotely approaching a drag race yet. What we’ve seen is Gaviria and QS deliver a lesson in placement and timing to two guys who haven’t managed to get into a competitive starting position.

Now you can argue about how much of that lesson is coming from QS and how much from Gaviria and to the extent that it’s Gaviria himself getting it right, well that’s also part of a sprinter’s skill set. But what a lot of people value most in a sprinter (wrongly!) is pure speed and so you get exchanges of opinion which go something like “Groenewegen was clearly traveling the fastest” versus “Gaviria won” both of which are true and neither of which prove very much absent context - ie that it’s easier to be fastest when other guys are taking the wind at the front of the sprint and it’s easier to win when you have a dominant team setting things up for you.

(The main reason I like Viviani is that I think he’s probably the slowest in pure athletic terms of the top tier sprinters, unless you start counting guys like Kristoff, but he’s so much better than that because he’s smarter than those other idiots).
 
Re:

Mayomaniac said:
Pasqualon has ridden a solid Tour so far, pretty good for a 3rd rate sprinter who's probably more of a one day racer.

He certainly is going well so far, much better than he did in last years TDF. He's been in form all season to date and maybe he can get into a break on one of the more 1 day classic type days and get a shot at sprinting for a win away from the 1st tier sprinters.