Re: Re:
Valv.Piti said:
Zinoviev Letter said:
The silly part of this discussion is the assumption among some that teams go to all the trouble of assembling a sprint support team, paying them, drilling them, picking them for race squads and putting them to work all for no reason because ultimately the guy who is just the fastest wins.
Of course it matters, but some people come off as incredibly butthurt.
So if you get dropped off with a great leadout, you basically can't win, can you? People downplay the win to a laughable extent and point towards Kittel and Groenewegen as faster guys. COME ON.
I agree that there’s often a bit of biased axe grinding going on in these discussions, but I really don’t see how anyone can draw conclusions about the speed of, say, Gaviria v Kittel v Groenewegen at the moment when we haven’t seen them in anything remotely approaching a drag race yet. What we’ve seen is Gaviria and QS deliver a lesson in placement and timing to two guys who haven’t managed to get into a competitive starting position.
Now you can argue about how much of that lesson is coming from QS and how much from Gaviria and to the extent that it’s Gaviria himself getting it right, well that’s also part of a sprinter’s skill set. But what a lot of people value most in a sprinter (wrongly!) is pure speed and so you get exchanges of opinion which go something like “Groenewegen was clearly traveling the fastest” versus “Gaviria won” both of which are true and neither of which prove very much absent context - ie that it’s easier to be fastest when other guys are taking the wind at the front of the sprint and it’s easier to win when you have a dominant team setting things up for you.
(The main reason I like Viviani is that I think he’s probably the slowest in pure athletic terms of the top tier sprinters, unless you start counting guys like Kristoff, but he’s so much better than that because he’s smarter than those other idiots).