TANK91 said:
Froome more dominant than you're wierdo Evans.
Despite yespattern's non-fan stance toward Evans, I want to point out that Evans is one of the most consistent riders in the peloton. He was good all year, every year. Never great, never world shattering, but always just good. The charge yespattern levels is that Froome wasn't good, ever, and then suddenly--as you put it--he dominates.
Furthermore, in response to your judgment of Pinot, I present as evidence his current age: 24. He hasn't been a podium contender yet b/c the last and only time he finished the Tour he was 22.
To put that into perspective, Ulle finished second at 22 and dominated at 23. (It may be 23 and 24, can't recall exactly.) And that's Ullrich, one of the greatest talents we've seen in the past two decades, regardless of enhancements.
For a young Frenchman to be doing this well is amazing. And not only that, but he's
developing. Instead of going from pack fodder to 1st in a year, he went from 10th at the Tour to 7th at the Vuelta to (hopefully) 3rd or even 2nd at the Tour in three years. That's a reasonable progression for a young talent if you ask me. Expecting him to be winning it all already is unreasonable, and dismissing him as not having a chance is just silly.