Mambo95 said:
Yeah, a guy who's won six races his entire career winning the green jersey with a best stage finish of third. That's just what the Tour needs to breathe life into it.
I didn't say he had to win the green jersey. But if he got a big haul of points tomorrow and Cavendish didn't, it would then make it so Cavendish had to take points on the Champs-Elysées to take the green jersey to win it back, and it would go to the final day. Cavendish would still be the most likely winner (even if Cavendish isn't there in the finale tomorrow I don't see Rojas coming top 2-3 in the stage with that run in), but it would go to the final day.
Basically, if nobody really wants to fight for the yellow jersey, at least give us a fight for one of the other ones.
Alpe - the call for an ITT or at least something that settles the GC into some kind of order to prevent all the "we need to be up the front to protect our GC" muscling that led to all the crashes is precisely why I have been against this year's route. You could have had a really good route with these stages, just in a different order. Now, by the time we even get to the mountains half the GC field has crashed out because of a nervous péloton on some flat stages. The total sum of the GC action until Luz Ardiden was 6 seconds on stage 1, 8 seconds on stage 4, a TTT and the rest was crashes. For 12 days of a 21-stage GT. That's a woeful amount. I know it's been pointed out to me that not every stage needs to be GC-relevant, and I accept that - but I'd like there to be more than 1 GC-relevant stage in the first two weeks.
And that if we are going to stuff all the GC-relevant stages into one week, we don't then stick the only remaining flat stage on at the weekend when most people are able to watch.