ilillillli said:
milram is one of those teams that i can't really understand what their plan is. Send Wegmann and Gerdemann up the road for stage wins after they're out of it? sorry, i don't really get how this is a pro-tour team. someone explain.
Kluge, Roberts and Ciolek can put together a half-decent sprint train, but not one I expect to be particularly effective against the engines in the Tour. Gerdemann and Wegmann are both good stagehunters. Wegmann in particular is a rider I have a lot of time for. He'll get into a lot of breaks and sprint from a reduced bunch; maybe get them something in week 2. Somebody like him or Rohregger could get into a break early in the race and hold the KOM for a short while too (the KOM points system in the Tour will work against him being able to repeat his Giro KOM from a few years ago). Gerdemann would have won a Vuelta stage had he not punctured a few km out last year, and Gerdemann will get them some exposure with his doomed, hopeless darts near the ends of stages.
As for how it's a ProTour team... when they joined the ProTour, they were led by Petacchi and Zabel. Petacchi then got banned and Zabel retired, and with German cycling in the doldrums, they couldn't get the budget to improve things. By most accounts they're not the most up-to-date or focused in their training methods, and see themselves more as a placeholder for German cycling than as a genuine major team. They've won at least one of their season goals though (Rund um den Finanzplatz) so their hope for a new sponsor is not doing too badly, but I doubt they'll be ProTour next year. And then it's bye-bye German cycling, which will be a crying shame.
Of the smaller teams like LKT Brandenburg, Heizomat, Seven Stones and the like, I think NetApp are definitely the ones to progress. If Milram fold, NetApp will pick up most of the riders that don't get a ProTour slot, and use that to build to ProConti status the same way Bessons Chaussures-Sojasun (now Saur) took most of the scraps from Crédit Agricole's yard sale.