Poels often has one or 2 monster days on a steep climb durning a GT, just thing about 2014 Zoncolan and La Farrapona + Anglirú in 2011, but the fact that he got dropped on the first climb is really strange.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
True, they dropped him later on. If it wasn't for Froomes performance it would have looked very much like a typical first mountain stage from Sky. How lucky to have 2 domestics working for you when you are not feeling good and you only had one the two previous day's...LaFlorecita said:They dropped him!Lyon said:To be fair, Poels and Porte couldn't drop Contador etc. when they responded to Quintanas first few attacks. Not that they have any business being near even a struggling Contador at that part of the stage.jellyfisher said:argel said:Froome almost being dropped by Poels and Porte
This.
Lyon said:True, they dropped him later on. If it wasn't for Froomes performance it would have looked very much like a typical first mountain stage from Sky. How lucky to have 2 domestics working for you when you are not feeling good and you only had one the two previous day's...LaFlorecita said:They dropped him!Lyon said:To be fair, Poels and Porte couldn't drop Contador etc. when they responded to Quintanas first few attacks. Not that they have any business being near even a struggling Contador at that part of the stage.jellyfisher said:argel said:Froome almost being dropped by Poels and Porte
This.
They dropped him! [/quote]To be fair, Poels and Porte couldn't drop Contador etc. when they responded to Quintanas first few attacks. Not that they have any business being near even a struggling Contador at that part of the stage.
My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
42x16ss said:My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
del1962 said:42x16ss said:My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
Why make things up, Quintana increased the gap in the last 2km by 5 seconds?
Saint Unix said:
Team Sky casually enjoying a couple of cans of celebratory urine.
When Quintana crossed the line, the time gap from him to Froome was given as over 1'30. When Froome crossed the line it was barely 1'20. Watch the stage again, Froome took off like he was strapped to an ICBM shortly before Quintana crossed the line.Dear Wiggo said:del1962 said:42x16ss said:My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
Why make things up, Quintana increased the gap in the last 2km by 5 seconds?
I don't think he's making things up.
It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
So the final time gap would potentially look like Froome had made time up on Quintana, when in fact the time gap went from the Pinot time gap to the Quintana time gap.
Just my 2c hypothesis as to the confusion.
I only say this as I found some of the time gap info confusing myself.
Saint Unix said:
Team Sky casually enjoying a couple of cans of celebratory urine.
42x16ss said:When Quintana crossed the line, the time gap from him to Froome was given as over 1'30. When Froome crossed the line it was barely 1'20. Watch the stage again, Froome took off like he was strapped to an ICBM shortly before Quintana crossed the line.Dear Wiggo said:del1962 said:42x16ss said:My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
Why make things up, Quintana increased the gap in the last 2km by 5 seconds?
I don't think he's making things up.
It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
So the final time gap would potentially look like Froome had made time up on Quintana, when in fact the time gap went from the Pinot time gap to the Quintana time gap.
Just my 2c hypothesis as to the confusion.
I only say this as I found some of the time gap info confusing myself.
42x16ss said:When Quintana crossed the line, the time gap from him to Froome was given as over 1'30. When Froome crossed the line it was barely 1'20. Watch the stage again, Froome took off like he was strapped to an ICBM shortly before Quintana crossed the line.Dear Wiggo said:del1962 said:42x16ss said:My thoughts too. Once Froome finally hit the afterburners he clawed back roughly 12-15 seconds in around 2km. Controlled loss for PR reasons?arvc40 said:Really great acting by Sky and Froome on the Alpe. Great PR exercise just like 2013.
Why make things up, Quintana increased the gap in the last 2km by 5 seconds?
I don't think he's making things up.
It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
So the final time gap would potentially look like Froome had made time up on Quintana, when in fact the time gap went from the Pinot time gap to the Quintana time gap.
Just my 2c hypothesis as to the confusion.
I only say this as I found some of the time gap info confusing myself.
gazr99 said:It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
gazr99 said:Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
42x16ss said:gazr99 said:Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Tell us again how Froome had crap Kenyan gear at the 2010 Comm Games. Or how poor rural Africans can't become good junior and U23 cyclists. Or that the competition at the Comm Games is equal to La Vuelta. Or that South Africa has no cycling infrastructure or culture.
You've had a few nice misses this last week
del1962 said:gazr99 said:It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Doesn't matter that he makes stuff up because no doubt someone will be along any minute to say it doesn't matter that he made it up as there are another gazillion other made up things that prove doping and you have to challenge everyone of them
del1962 said:42x16ss said:gazr99 said:Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Tell us again how Froome had crap Kenyan gear at the 2010 Comm Games. Or how poor rural Africans can't become good junior and U23 cyclists. Or that the competition at the Comm Games is equal to La Vuelta. Or that South Africa has no cycling infrastructure or culture.
You've had a few nice misses this last week
What has this got to do with you making stuff up?
42x16ss said:gazr99 said:Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Tell us again how Froome had crap Kenyan gear at the 2010 Comm Games. Or how poor rural Africans can't become good junior and U23 cyclists. Or that the competition at the Comm Games is equal to La Vuelta. Or that South Africa has no cycling infrastructure or culture.
You've had a few nice misses this last week
gazr99 said:42x16ss said:gazr99 said:Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Tell us again how Froome had crap Kenyan gear at the 2010 Comm Games. Or how poor rural Africans can't become good junior and U23 cyclists. Or that the competition at the Comm Games is equal to La Vuelta. Or that South Africa has no cycling infrastructure or culture.
You've had a few nice misses this last week
LOL when I have I ever said that. You should be a journalist getting about taking 20% of what someone says and turn it into something. These are great "facts" though
I talked about Froome in 2006 not 2010 when he represented Kenya, in as those who were there described very basic equipment especially compared to many of his competitors. Never said Africans can't become good, said he hasn't been nurtured and had elite coaching since he was a junior like many of the peleton, that didn't start until his 20's and arguably when he joined Sky, he had truly elite coaching/support system. The other two I just never said
gazr99 said:Sure fine yeah you must be right, I won't bring up that he had no elite coaching/infrastructure until 2010 and was irritating Team Sky by the fact they could see the talent and data to say he is great rider but he would be very inconsistent, which they found out in 2011 was due to a bacterial infection.
gazr99 said:Talented riders like the ones you mentioned are going to be spotted as Froome was, doesn't mean they were fulfilling their potential. How many of them were junior champions and on the Tour de L'Avenir while based in Africa, a continent which is not historically known for putting money into cycling
Bit rich coming from you. Considering you are the one who deliberately edited out words from a quote Marco Pinotti made, to make Marco look like he was supporting Lance, when in fact the whole quote in full clearly had a totally different meaning.del1962 said:gazr99 said:It was confusing with the time gaps appearing to indicate time from Froome to Quintana, but in fact it was time from Pinot to Froome.
Another famous 42x16ss "fact" must match his theory or did Froome actually slow down in the last 2km's for PR reasons
Doesn't matter that he makes stuff up
TheRedSon said:I've always appreciated the value of that 17th in 2006 with shoddy equipment.
http://autobus.cyclingnews.com/photos/2006/mar06/commgames06/index.php?id=men_road_tt/e
Australia won just about every medal on the road that year. Honestly, it's a wonder the Commonwealth could produce 80 cyclists at all if they were going to limit Australia and Canada to just three each.
Anyway, Froome didn't beat anyone from Australia, New Zealand, England, Canada, Northern Ireland or South Africa. He beat the other guys on bikes like the one in that picture linked above.