If having a team staff member who has a doping past is the litmus test of a systematic doping program, then every team would be guilty (I know this is the dogmatic assertion of many in this clinic...), but, there is no specific evidence that Leinders administered a program while at Sky, the timeline does not fit, and the historical absolute performance data does not fit.
What will be the explanation when the criminal investigation against Leinders doesn't incriminate SKy?
What will be the explanation when Sky's performance does not decrease this year despite Leinders' absence?
What will be the explanation when Wiggins wins the Giro without Leinders?
What will be the explanation when Froome wins the Tour without Leinders?