- Jul 17, 2012
- 2,051
- 0
- 0
will10 said:It's the four climbers in an elite group of 8/10 riders that's the concerning part.
Indeed. And that is why I have stated my believe that the Sky performances range from almost certainly dodgy to very suspicious! I've written this twice already; maybe this time someone will actually read it.
However, this performance comprised 2 guys performing at 1980s elite level (Wiggo and Fenton) and 2 guys performing at a signficantly lower level, just as Popo, Rubiera etc. were performing at a lower level than Lance. Whether the performance gaps are due to differences in natural ability or different doping programmes is interesting though actually irrelevant to the point in question.
Sky may have had 4 riders personally blessed by the Pope, doped to the eyeballs, enjoying preferential treatment from the UCI and/or motors on their bikes, but the claim made upthread that a team had 4 or 5 riders performing at 1980s elite level is just not true. Sky had two. You can count them if you like. They were the guys in the lead group at the top of the final climbs, not the ones who peeled off at the bottom. One was in yellow, the other has an odd style and looks at his Powermeter all the time. This should not really be a very hard concept to grasp.
