DirtyWorks said:We know work in bike racing is bought and sold. Movistar has no GC hopefuls, so why not make hay while the sun shines?
Who was selling today and what did Movistar buy, because from where I was watching it failed.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
DirtyWorks said:We know work in bike racing is bought and sold. Movistar has no GC hopefuls, so why not make hay while the sun shines?
The Chicken said:ASO know full well that a Sky massacre like yesterday is bad for business.
burning said:Time to have a refill like 2005 Disco
The Chicken said:That was friggin' funny.
ASO know full well that a Sky massacre like yesterday is bad for business. There was an outcry from pretty much all who witnessed it. Only a team-wide 'collapse' the following day would allow the event to salvage some credibility, and so that's what Prudhomme ordered. Farcical. Even Liggett remarked on how Porte looked fine in the face as he slipped backwards.
Pro cycling is just a comedy for me now. If I'm not laughing at the sport, I'm laughing at the simpletons who actually think what they're seeing is real. LOL.
Chaddy said:CN should send you a free tinfoil hat when you make your first post in the clinic.
the sceptic said:Kiryenka missed the time limit? Shame this tour was designed by a sprinter
boladelmundo said:Kiryienka missing time limit is an unbelievable event, unless he's ill.
I meant, look at his pedigree:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasil_Kiryienka
It is not like he's a 20 something neopro who has just started riding TdF this year.
zeamonkey said:Yes tragically i dont believe in miracles either......and for that im sorry LOL
boladelmundo said:Kiryienka missing time limit is an unbelievable event, unless he's ill.
I meant, look at his pedigree:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasil_Kiryienka
It is not like he's a 20 something neopro who has just started riding TdF this year.
The Hitch said:Whats the reason for Froome riding as fast as Armstrong if he isn't doping.
And how fast do you believe Froome could have ridden yesterday if he did get put on a doping programme?
lemoogle said:If movistar win would it also be a victory for Clean Cycling ? or is clean cycling just clean Sky beating doped up spaniards.
zeamonkey said:You have a better explanation for him being 3 min behind at this stage after yesterdays display?
martinvickers said:Is this not kind of what the phrase "jour sans" was invented for?
Last i checked, one of the things that riled Paul Kimmage was riders 'never having a bad day'. He wanted to see top riders have bad days; and also wanted to see riders like Martin win.
Bang. Martin wins (thank f***ing god for that!! sorry, irish moment!) Bang. Porte has a bad, no, an awful day, as do several other skyborgs. -
Are we happier? Are we f***!. Proof he's doping, I tells ya! Proof.
Oh this place is going to amuse over the next few weeks by god. Get in the popcorn.
martinvickers said:Because the Armstrong is not the SI unit for doping, perhaps?
Impossible to tell. Doping rewards responders not talent.
The Chicken said:That was friggin' funny.
ASO know full well that a Sky massacre like yesterday is bad for business. There was an outcry from pretty much all who witnessed it. Only a team-wide 'collapse' the following day would allow the event to salvage some credibility, and so that's what Prudhomme ordered. Farcical. Even Liggett remarked on how Porte looked fine in the face as he slipped backwards.
Pro cycling is just a comedy for me now. If I'm not laughing at the sport, I'm laughing at the simpletons who actually think what they're seeing is real. LOL.
the sceptic said:Jimmyvickers is still a believer? lol who could have guessed
If climbing as fast as Armstrong doesnt do it then i guess nothing will, hell even a positive test probably wouldnt convince you by now
why cant garmin climb at 6.5w/kg clean by the way?
the sceptic said:Jimmyvickers is still a believer? lol who could have guessed
If climbing as fast as Armstrong doesnt do it then i guess nothing will, hell even a positive test probably wouldnt convince you by now
why cant garmin climb at 6.5w/kg clean by the way?