Team Ineos (Formerly the Sky thread)

Page 933 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Parker said:
Gewiss at Fleche 94

1. Argentin
2. Furlan
3. Berzin
4th @ 1.14

Sky at Ventoux 13

1. Froome
15. Porte
45. Kennaugh

I'm not seeing the parallels. Every time they go up Ventoux, somebody wins. And Froome did the climb slower than they did in 2009 when everyone moaned that nobody seemed to want to race.
People could call this baiting, because, you, Parker, know, someone will call you a moron for this.

And the person who does this will get a ban for this.

Well. Parker, I call you a moron for this.
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,102
6
10,495
Look, the team is in front of the group in Montreal. That's enough for me. They're doping. Not to mention the cadence. Who you think you're fooling, Brailsford?
 
Mar 4, 2011
3,346
451
14,580
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
People could call this baiting, because, you, Parker, know, someone will call you a moron for this.

And the person who does this will get a ban for this.

Well. Parker, I call you a moron for this.

Perhaps if you put forward some reasoning for this view you might not be banned.

Am I a moron for think that there is nothing particularly extraordinary in a rider winning a race? And in a fairly moderate time too.

I'm fortunate to have been watching cycling before EPO came along. I saw some remarkable rides. The sort of rides that would have most of you rushing to your keyboards so register your displeasure. I've seen it all before so I don't get worked up every time someone elevates themselves above the mundane.
 
Jul 22, 2011
1,129
4
10,485
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
People could call this baiting, because, you, Parker, know, someone will call you a moron for this.

And the person who does this will get a ban for this.

Well. Parker, I call you a moron for this.

This sort of post really p****s me off on this site.

If the earlier comment is moronic, why not explain where its wrong?
Me, I don't know either way, but some of the comments sure p*** me off
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
SundayRider said:
So what happened to Tiernan-Locke ? Unwilling to 'prepare' and work as hard as the others?

Go ask him, i heard he trains a lot on the same roads around his home

He acts like a lonely Rambo so im sure if Sky asked him to take something illegal he will be more that happy to wreak havoc on them.
 
Dec 13, 2012
1,859
0
0
EnacheV said:
Go ask him, i heard he trains a lot on the same roads around his home

He acts like a lonely Rambo so im sure if Sky asked him to take something illegal he will be more that happy to wreak havoc on them.

Sky take on a good rider with good results - he does nothing this year. Yet Sky's methods produce Chris Fromme :rolleyes:
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
SundayRider said:
Sky take on a good rider with good results - he does nothing this year. Yet Sky's methods produce Chris Fromme :rolleyes:

maybe he is not that good

Cycle Chic said:
I think we,ve all lost the will to comment or care. The Clinic is dying a slow death.

i was always wondering from where is this energy to talk so much about so little
 
Aug 24, 2011
4,349
0
13,480
SundayRider said:
Sky take on a good rider with good results - he does nothing this year. Yet Sky's methods produce Chris Fromme :rolleyes:

Wasn't last year everyone saying JTL was on something?
Maybe he was and now he is with Sky maybe he isn't ?

In several places he has been interviewed and said he found Kerrigan's training methods too tough. Expect his training to be adjusted and him to be better next year (though still not going to get any race leaderships)
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Catwhoorg said:
Wasn't last year everyone saying JTL was on something?
Maybe he was and now he is with Sky maybe he isn't ?

In several places he has been interviewed and said he found Kerrigan's training methods too tough. Expect his training to be adjusted and him to be better next year (though still not going to get any race leaderships)

Not believing that. The 'Master of Detail' takes on a 'talented' rider and he under performs because the training is too tough. BS.
 

EnacheV

BANNED
Jul 7, 2013
1,441
0
0
Benotti69 said:
Not believing that. The 'Master of Detail' takes on a 'talented' rider and he under performs because the training is too tough. BS.

So JTL doped Sky version is worse than last year JTL clean NetApp version ? Only if Sky dope them with cookies and bigmac's
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,130
29,759
28,180
Or maybe he pulled a 'Sir Wiggo' and tuned down his dope after landing a big fat contract (or maybe he tuned it down because he now is a part of the passport, which I don't think he was last year). With the lesser amount of dope he can't handle the workload from the training and performs absolutely poorly.

Could be, could be something else.
 
Jan 27, 2012
15,230
2,615
28,180
EnacheV said:
So JTL doped Sky version is worse than last year JTL clean NetApp version ? Only if Sky dope them with cookies and bigmac's

JTL was on the McQ clan doping program (check out JTL's agent) last year in order to beef up contact values and fees. This is not difficult to figure out. Everybody should be able to follow the stuff.
 
Oct 16, 2012
10,364
179
22,680
Dazed and Confused said:
JTL was on the McQ clan doping program (check out JTL's agent) last year in order to beef up contact values and fees. This is not difficult to figure out. Everybody should be able to follow the stuff.

A new proof of doping, a McQuaid as an agent, so Nico was on this program before he joined up with Bjarne?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
EnacheV said:
So JTL doped Sky version is worse than last year JTL clean NetApp version ? Only if Sky dope them with cookies and bigmac's

A rider goes from Conti team to Sky after an early season win and posters are wondering how many TdFs he will win at sky. Then he does an EBH and no one is suspicious! Sky have so many questions to answer about riders and not the crap Brailsford feeds the cycling 'copy and paste monkeys' posing as journalists.
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
William H said:
Porte and Wiggins I guess

Why Porte? T-10 with Sax at Giro. Even minus the 16-mis-break he´d have made it.
Even tough i doubt Wiggins very much, he had his outbreak well before, with the clean team GAR. Can´t blame that on Sky.

Netserk said:
Overachieving compared to what? Clean, or doped on another team?

I think everybody is more or less on the same level (doping wise). Except RSH, maybe Movistar. They are not the masters there at Sky...
So to answer your Q, compared to other teams/riders in general.
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,130
29,759
28,180
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
Why Porte? T-10 with Sax at Giro. Even minus the 16-mis-break he´d have made it.
Even tough i doubt Wiggins very much, he had his outbreak well before, with the clean team GAR. Can´t blame that on Sky.

He had his outbreak with BC, which basically means he had it with Sky.

FoxxyBrown1111 said:
I think everybody is more or less on the same level (doping wise). Except RSH, maybe Movistar. They are not the masters there at Sky...
So to answer your Q, compared to other teams/riders in general.

So that's the second option?
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
Why Porte? T-10 with Sax at Giro. Even minus the 16-mis-break he´d have made it.

With Sky he also won PN, and placed 2nd at Pais Vasco, the Dauphine, and Criterium international. Aside from his Giro top 10, his other best results at Saxo were mostly some high placing's in TT's, and a couple top 10's at some smaller stage races. Not to mention the pivotal role he's played in Froomes train as Froomes last man to reduce whatever was left of the peloton down to a select group of only the best.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
Why Porte? T-10 with Sax at Giro. Even minus the 16-mis-break he´d have made it.
.

No he probably wouldn't.

What you are trying to say (im assuming) is that if you take away 12 minutes from portes time he would in theory still end up in the top 10.

That ignores the fact that the Laquilla break also gave him a team of domestiques (including CAS) at his disposal.

It also meant that plenty of people that would have easily beaten Porte for top 10, gave up on it and started working as domestiques or looking for stage wins.

Half the peloton could top 10 a giro if you remove most of the contenders from the equation and give them CAS as a superdomestique.

Your beloved Chris Horner could have probably top 10'd any gt from the late 90's if you gave him those 2 things.