Team Ineos (Formerly the Sky thread)

Page 51 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 10, 2011
247
0
0
Gloin22 said:
I gotta say most of the Pros disagree with all your talk. Brajkovic is one of many to speak out.

"Couple of years ago every1 was laughing at @TeamSky for doing million things trying to improve performance, now when they're flying it's very easy to say they must be doing something... Yes, they r, training, nutrition, dedication, etc. well deserved".

There's no way the pro Peleton is going to say anything outside of that. Ask Filippo Simeoni if telling the truth while still trying to be an active cyclist was a good idea.
 
Jul 16, 2011
268
61
9,130
Big Doopie said:
i am no wiggins fan -- and found his press tirade to be textbook armstrong actually. i also find froome's perf here and at the vuelta quite shocking. however, i simply cannot understand the logic of posters who "pray" for nibali or wish contadope was competing.

the double standard is even more stunning.

nibali has far more clinic suspicious connections than either wiggins or froome.

and -- for all we know -- contadope's entire career -- based on real facts, seems likely to be due to doping.

Not sure what an attack on AC is doing here; but let me remind you of a time, when a wonderful and entertaining cyclist won an ITT by 3 seconds over Canc:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/tour-de-france/stage-9/results
 
Jul 4, 2010
5,669
1,349
20,680
Gloin22 said:
I gotta say most of the Pros disagree with all your talk. Brajkovic is one of many to speak out.

"Couple of years ago every1 was laughing at @TeamSky for doing million things trying to improve performance, now when they're flying it's very easy to say they must be doing something... Yes, they r, training, nutrition, dedication, etc. well deserved".

So its already been mentioned to him?

I bet Spartacus is sick man, sick.
 
Oct 16, 2009
3,864
0
0
Man, Vaughter's training methods at Garmin must be rubbish. Not only is Wiggins a significantly better climber than he was in 2009, he's also ten times the time trialist.
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,225
1
0
Gloin22 said:
I gotta say most of the Pros disagree with all your talk. Brajkovic is one of many to speak out.

"Couple of years ago every1 was laughing at @TeamSky for doing million things trying to improve performance, now when they're flying it's very easy to say they must be doing something... Yes, they r, training, nutrition, dedication, etc. well deserved".

how many pros spoke out on Basson's behalf?

I don't like their credibility...
 
Apr 10, 2011
4,818
0
0
MartinGT said:
So its already been mentioned to him?

I bet Spartacus is sick man, sick.

Jani is very sociable. He has a account and posted few times on PCM.Daily.

He might have cyclingews account too, I dunno. Thing is, he reads forums and stuff like that...
 
Jul 8, 2012
314
0
0
Have Wiggins taken any giant leaps since 2009 when he came 4th after Contador, Schleck and Armstrong? He both timetrialed and climbed well in 2009. And if one agrees that he didn't doped then, when he was with Garmin-Slipstream, I can't see how one can say that he must be doping now when he is with Sky. His slight progress could just as well be explained with a couple of years of hard dedication and building towards TdF.
 

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
Grayguard said:
Not sure what an attack on AC is doing here

since we cannot post (reality) clinic related stuff in the pro racing forum, i am questioning those who have pined for contador in those threads.

cheers.
 
Mar 10, 2009
251
0
0
Dr.Sahl said:
Wiggins don't peak, he just got a natural form around the year...

Didnt you hear him earlier ?? he is not even riding full speed, this is just like soft training for him..

Yes I thought he looked a little slow and heavy. No doubt he will peak for the Olympics.
 
Jun 18, 2009
1,225
1
0
Big Doopie said:
i am no wiggins fan -- and found his press tirade to be textbook armstrong actually. i also find froome's perf here and at the vuelta quite shocking. however, i simply cannot understand the logic of posters who "pray" for nibali or wish contadope was competing.

the double standard is even more stunning.

nibali has far more clinic suspicious connections than either wiggins or froome.

and -- for all we know -- contadope's entire career -- based on real facts, seems likely to be due to doping.

You are of course right, because the fact is doping has shuffled the deck to the point where no one knows what's real and not real. It's impossible to tell. What we do know is that Contador at least comports himself like a real champion and Wigans is behaving like a schoolboy, so he at least gets points on that front. Talk of doping aside, my money is on Froome, not Wigans. I think he's going to come unglued at some point.
 

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
Falken said:
Have Wiggins taken any giant leaps since 2009 when he came 4th after Contador, Schleck and Armstrong? He both timetrialed and climbed well in 2009. And if one agrees that he didn't doped then, when he was with Garmin-Slipstream, I can't see how one can say that he must be doping now when he is with Sky. His slight progress could just as well be explained with a couple of years of hard dedication and building towards TdF.

i have no idea tbh.

you also have to remember that -- had he not crashed out last year -- this might have already happened. he was on quite a tear at the time and the form of his life.

but who knows?
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Zinoviev Letter said:
Jay Thomson, now riding with UHC, having knocked about at Conti level beforehand.

oh, him. I see that he can TT and is a year younger than Froome. Not too late to become a GT big name with the right training.
 

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
131313 said:
You are of course right, because the fact is doping has shuffled the deck to the point where no one knows what's real and not real. It's impossible to tell.

bingo.

131313 said:
What we do know is that Contador at least comports himself like a real champion and Wigans is behaving like a schoolboy, so he at least gets points on that front.

not sure what you mean -- "comports himself" -- how? playing the omerta game. i do think his being able to totally destroy the armstrong/bruyneel head games in 2009 showed incredible strength. but i imagine he is just another big time doper so what exactly does that tell us?

131313 said:
Talk of doping aside, my money is on Froome, not Wigans. I think he's going to come unglued at some point.

interesting.
 
May 2, 2009
736
7
9,995
thehog said:
My next prediction after getting the ITT result correct and Wiggo’s violent reaction to dope talk is the following…. I predict on the next mountain stage they will go 1-2-3 maybe even 4 in the final group. Rogers and Porte took it easier today. They’re ready to completely smash it apart on the first MTF. Again dopers logic.

Brilliant call on the TT, but I'm not sure they will continue to smash it. Someone will reign them in to give them somewhat believable numbers.

The time gaps now are Tour winning margins. We're on day 10. Unbelievable.
 
Jul 6, 2010
2,340
0
0
goggalor said:
Man, Vaughter's training methods at Garmin must be rubbish. Not only is Wiggins a significantly better climber than he was in 2009, he's also ten times the time trialist.

Silly Vaughters...

He forgot all about the "Dedication + Sacrifice = Success" equation recently discovered at Sky.

What's gonna happen when the rest of the peloton actually start dedicating themselves to racing?
 
Jul 16, 2011
268
61
9,130
Big Doopie said:
since we cannot post (reality) clinic related stuff in the pro racing forum, i am questioning those who have pined for contador in those threads.

cheers.

Well, since all the best science in the world could not provide definitive proof (or truth); maybe the simple answer *IS* the truth? Just a possibility. After all some tourists have been tested positive too ;)

Besides that argument, which will never end:

IMHO: A true great rider, is willing to take risks and attack, and *make* a race: AC is such a rider. Others are too, but few, if any of them, are contending for the GC this year.

I would just like some more competition in his TdF, yes. I would *love* to have both Andy and AC in it. Alas, thats not the case.
 
May 19, 2011
4,857
2
0
who will be the first Pro rider stands out to question the result?
If Contador stands out to question W and F? That would be quite intesting:D
pre-battle before next year real battle
 
Jun 25, 2012
283
0
0
roundabout said:
oh, him. I see that he can TT and is a year younger than Froome. Not too late to become a GT big name with the right training.

I guess all ptt is trying to sign him.
 
Aug 18, 2010
11,435
3,594
28,180
roundabout said:
oh, him. I see that he can TT and is a year younger than Froome. Not too late to become a GT big name with the right training.

Well, he's still on Froome's schedule. If he follows the same pattern he should be about to make a huge step forward in both the mountains and in time trials any day now.
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
Gloin22 said:
I gotta say most of the Pros disagree with all your talk. Brajkovic is one of many to speak out.

"Couple of years ago every1 was laughing at @TeamSky for doing million things trying to improve performance, now when they're flying it's very easy to say they must be doing something... Yes, they r, training, nutrition, dedication, etc. well deserved".

Is Jani fishing for a spot on the team, so he can improve his performance with SKY led training, nutrition and dedication? :D

What happened has happened to Jani? Lacking training, nutrition and dedication these days?
 

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
Grayguard said:
IMHO: A true great rider, is willing to take risks and attack, and *make* a race: AC is such a rider. Others are too, but few, if any of them, are contending for the GC this year.

but that ability to "attack" has been directly related to the amount of doping a rider is doing.

is ricco a "true great rider"?

valverde?

vino?

these guys can't seem to attack quite so much when the sauce is lessened. so why do we continue to laud them and "miss" them? it's faulty logic imo.