Miguel In the rain said:Well Cav was waaaaaay quicker than anyone else today, an amazing finish, the guy is class. So is he doping too, or is he just the best sprinter in the world who has had a quiet few weeks as him team are concentrating on Wiggo's soon to be histroic win?
Agreed that Liquigas tactics the other day were stupid, they chose the same tactic Sky have been using on the climbs, that plays right into Bradleys hands, thats how he prefer the climbs. It worked for LQ in the Giro but their team is simply not as strong as Sky's and so when it came to the business end of the stage they had shelled most of their own riders leaving Sky to mop up. Well mop up 2nd and 3rd.
I don't like jumping to doping conclusions but that seems to be compulsory in the clinic so i'll join in, to me Vino, Horner and Valverde have aroused much more suspicion than any of the Sky team. Horner even faked a crash into the woods to get a quick juice boost in the thicket beofre rejoining as his team are so paranoid about being watched following the Frankie scandal![]()
Benotti69 said:You don't like to jump to doping conclusions?
Then don't jump to assume anyone is clean would be a start.
This is pro cycling after all.
It gets worse in here now with the sky fans assuming that the clinic is for so called cycling haters. Armstrongs were bad enough, but Wiggins are taking it to another level
The people in the clinic who call it as they see it watches the sport 365 days a year, not just July!
Nocontest said:Actually, he does get it and it is your response that is misinformed. You are talking about a Cancellara who's training has been severely compromised this year due to injury, riding on a course that was not ideally suited to him and forget about Wiggins for a moment; there were several other riders who either beat or were close to FC who he would usually wipe the floor with.
Plus this talk about road vs track is BS. Back in the day riders regularly did both. I don't recall anyone whining about Eddie Merckx being a trackie who was winning GT's or for that matter him being a GT winner being able to set one hour records on the track...all without massive changes to his physique.
enCYCLOpedia said:... Perhaps this just means that conventional wisdom is wrong?
simo1733 said:Coppi,Moser,Berzin.![]()
zlev11 said:anyone think those "warm downs" Sky does at the end of tough stages have anything to do with the drugs they're on? maybe they're all on something so hardcore that they can't just go from all out to a dead stop without dropping dead.
i remember seeing Wiggins do it after the Mende stage at Paris-Nice and thinking it was VERY strange, and then the entire team was doing it at the Dauphine.
zlev11 said:anyone think those "warm downs" Sky does at the end of tough stages have anything to do with the drugs they're on? maybe they're all on something so hardcore that they can't just go from all out to a dead stop without dropping dead.
Hugh Januss said:LeMond won a silver medal in pursuit at 1979 Jr. Worlds (and won the road race). He must have been a better pursuiter than Wigans because it didn't take him 10 years of flailing around in the laughing group before he won his first TdF.
andy1234 said:Who know how much flailing LeMond might have done, had his career started in the 90's or 00's instead of the 80's.
He ended up in the laughing group pretty quickly when the real doping started.
roundabout said:You are being far too civil to somebody who is not at the least interested in a genuine discussion.
andy1234 said:Who know how much flailing LeMond might have done, had his career started in the 90's or 00's instead of the 80's.
He ended up in the laughing group pretty quickly when the real doping started.
TubularBills said:http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/jul/20/bradley-wiggins-tour-de-france?intcmp=239
Bradley Wiggins set for £2m in prize and bonuses if he wins Tour de France
Cycling race's €450,000 first prize could be dwarfed by money from Team Sky contract if Briton is crowned champion
"The growing attraction of the Tour as a spectacle, as well as the success of Wiggins, has encouraged increasing numbers of people to take up cycling, which in turn is making the whole sport far more marketable to sponsors."
Hm.
2008885 said:What does "Hm" mean??
2008885 said:What does "Hm" mean??
andy1234 said:Do many of the posters here have so little knowledge of physiology in general, and cycling in particular, that they think the attributes required to be a world class pursuiter are so different than the attributes required to be a GT rider?
Vo2 max testing takes place over a very short period of time, not over multiple days or weeks, yet it is an excellent predictor of the ability to perform in a GT. Go figure?
Just ask Greg LeMond, he seems to think it's an essential ingredient of any GT contender.
Unsurprisingly, all world class pursuiters have world class Vo2 max levels.
Whether riding for 4 minutes, an hour, or 6 hours, the main limiting factor is how efficient the bodys oxygen delivery mechanism is. If it wasn't, the sport would not have been turned upside down by EPO.
Because the attributes required to turn in a 4km pursuit, there isn't a world class pursuiter who couldn't turn in a world class hour long time trial, even with a modest endurance base.
The limiting factors for most pursuiters, in stage races, would be body weight and lack of specific endurance training. If body weight can be managed, and the individual responds well to the endurance training, then all the attributes required to be successful are there. It just might take a few years (if it does at all) for the distance work to pay dividends
Miguel In the rain said:Well Cav was waaaaaay quicker than anyone else today, an amazing finish, the guy is class. So is he doping too, or is he just the best sprinter in the world who has had a quiet few weeks as him team are concentrating on Wiggo's soon to be histroic win?
...
andy1234 said:Do many of the posters here have so little knowledge of physiology in general, and cycling in particular, that they think the attributes required to be a world class pursuiter are so different than the attributes required to be a GT rider?
Vo2 max testing takes place over a very short period of time, not over multiple days or weeks, yet it is an excellent predictor of the ability to perform in a GT. Go figure?
Just ask Greg LeMond, he seems to think it's an essential ingredient of any GT contender.
Unsurprisingly, all world class pursuiters have world class Vo2 max levels.
Whether riding for 4 minutes, an hour, or 6 hours, the main limiting factor is how efficient the bodys oxygen delivery mechanism is. If it wasn't, the sport would not have been turned upside down by EPO.
Because the attributes required to turn in a 4km pursuit, there isn't a world class pursuiter who couldn't turn in a world class hour long time trial, even with a modest endurance base.
The limiting factors for most pursuiters, in stage races, would be body weight and lack of specific endurance training. If body weight can be managed, and the individual responds well to the endurance training, then all the attributes required to be successful are there. It just might take a few years (if it does at all) for the distance work to pay dividends
Dr. Maserati said:Ah, here we go again.
A GT is a 20+ day stage race, of course you will find that (natural) riders will have a high V02max number - that does not mean that someone who has a high V02 is going to withstand the rigors of a 20+ day stage race.
Just because you have the first ball out of the lottery/powerball does not mean you will win the big prize it just means you are still in the game.
Hugh Januss said:I think "Hm" means that one can just replace Wigan's name in the quoted part with that of a certain Lance Armstrong and it would all read the same.![]()
2008885 said:Ah, I see - just another juvenile BW = LA post.
2008885 said:Ah, I see - just another juvenile BW = LA post.
andy1234 said:Do many of the posters here have so little knowledge of physiology in general, and cycling in particular, that they think the attributes required to be a world class pursuiter are so different than the attributes required to be a GT rider?
Vo2 max testing takes place over a very short period of time, not over multiple days or weeks, yet it is an excellent predictor of the ability to perform in a GT. Go figure?
Just ask Greg LeMond, he seems to think it's an essential ingredient of any GT contender.
Unsurprisingly, all world class pursuiters have world class Vo2 max levels.
Whether riding for 4 minutes, an hour, or 6 hours, the main limiting factor is how efficient the bodys oxygen delivery mechanism is. If it wasn't, the sport would not have been turned upside down by EPO.
Because the attributes required to turn in a 4km pursuit, there isn't a world class pursuiter who couldn't turn in a world class hour long time trial, even with a modest endurance base.
The limiting factors for most pursuiters, in stage races, would be body weight and lack of specific endurance training. If body weight can be managed, and the individual responds well to the endurance training, then all the attributes required to be successful are there. It just might take a few years (if it does at all) for the distance work to pay dividends
