• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

thank you livestrong.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
When the OP gets edited by the mod, wouldn't THIS be a situation where the thread should just be deleted? Are the rest of us supposed to do interpretive dance on what we think the OP meant to say?

dance2.jpg
 
Ah, humor, that's the ticket.

Perhaps if the 'humor' inherent in the Livestrong.com article's situation/character description could be further developed, then the thread would stand?

The picture could fit with the scenario.

Dave.
 
Jul 20, 2009
11
0
0
BotanyBay said:
When the OP gets edited by the mod, wouldn't THIS be a situation where the thread should just be deleted? Are the rest of us supposed to do interpretive dance on what we think the OP meant to say?

all i did was post a link to a livestrong.com blog article under the category of /marriage-infidelity and made a comparison with a quote in the article to why men cheat on wives and how it resembled arguments to why pros take peds.

im a little baffled as to why the post was modded for hate.

could have been my snarky sarcstic remarks?!?!
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
hiccuphell said:
all i did was post a link to a livestrong.com blog article under the category of /marriage-infidelity and made a comparison with a quote in the article to why men cheat on wives and how it resembled arguments to why pros take peds.

im a little baffled as to why the post was modded for hate.

could have been my snarky sarcstic remarks?!?!

On this forum, you might want to try a more mainstream "start" for your first posts.
 
Oct 29, 2009
2,578
0
0
hiccuphell said:
all i did was post a link to a livestrong.com blog article under the category of /marriage-infidelity and made a comparison with a quote in the article to why men cheat on wives and how it resembled arguments to why pros take peds.

im a little baffled as to why the post was modded for hate.

could have been my snarky sarcstic remarks?!?!

I just read it, if I had modded it, I would have modded it for being fairly indecipherable. Without the above, describing what is was meant to be, I can't fault another mod for getting another end of another stick with it.

That, or "we" are getting pretty tired with people going around branding groups they disagree with as haters. For a first post on a forum that doesn't welcome that sort of attitude... think before you post.

But I agree, pointless thread now. Thread closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.