Thank You, palmerq

[TheGame]

Why is this thread still open?

Or is it not against the rules to criticize other members anymore? **** me, lets all have a party, congratulations mods on banning someone, lets all come here and tell you how pleased we are that you banned them.

Three months? Where did that come from? One month, yes siree, perma-ban, thats been heard of. Three Months? You're making this up as you go along.

And then allowing members to create a thread where they publicly slate the aforementioned member and give the moderators a pat on the back.

Bite me!

 

[pedaling squares]

Have to agree with The Game. Well, not the bite me part. That would be creepy. Polish is one 'troll' who never bothered me, probably because he could be very funny and because he was right enough of the time to be tolerable. But that's not meant to critique palmerq's decision, as he is in the mix and knows when it's time to pull the trigger. 3 months though, wow. Bit of a precedent set there. But what's with this thread? Is it a place to gloat, a place to suck up, or another place where Dr Mas can nitpick every nuance of his antagonists' posts? Either way, it's pretty tiresome and a bit petty.

 

[Race Radio]

my theory is that it is more fun to have a sockpuppet when you are not banned. Replying to one's posts to ratchet up the screeching is pretty entertaining

There is a word for this but it escapes me at the moment....

 

[ChrisE]

There is a word for this but it escapes me at the moment....

Clever.

I wanted to write it for you. You are not doing too well with spellcheck lately.

 

[palmerq]

Why is this thread still open?

I concur.. lets all talk about the moderating stuff in the moderators thread http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=7152&page=251