- Jan 1, 2014
- 111
- 0
- 0
Having both Gerrans and Quintana in my team I feel pretty happy with San Luis and Down Under...I hope they will both get the GC! I also expect Pozzato to get a win tonight in San Luis!
I think we are talking next to eachother now. You arr talking about a possible official ranking right? If so, you're completely right, I was talking about a hypothetical ranking which would make this game more 'fair', which is relative of course, because everyone has Access to the same knowledge. It was just hypothetical.ingsve said:That sounds like a very hard thing to regulate and could potentially be abused. At any rate that is sort of what the race cassifications is about in a way. Lesser categorized races implies that the field is weaker and hence gives fewer points. The problem rather is that some higher categorized races don't attract enough good riders which leads to the situation where two races of the same category can have vastly different starting fields. The solution to this is having more mandatory participations or fixed schedules but that has
it's own problems and would probably not be popular for other reasons.
NairoQ said:So Zubeldia will have a great year while Betancur is over his top already?
Atapuma looks good indeed, but just for now. It's to early for any conclusions, De Clercq didn't have a wonderful season last year, did he?
Pentacycle said:De Clercq crashed out of the Vuelta and he had to work for Greipel in the Tour. But his performances on some mountainous stages were very promising. 6th on Alto Penas Blancas and 11th on le Ventoux. Cq doesn't tell the whole tale about a rider's season.
NairoQ said:Do you even read? Did I tell De Clercq is an overrated rider? I didn't. I only told that a race this early can hardly mean anything for the rest of the season, as anything can still happen. The only thing you can say about the races already ridden is that they did or didn't give you a good amount of points already.
And since this IS cq-game, cq ranking tells a lót about how much a rider's value that particular season, and even more, it tells everything about it.
NairoQ said:Hmm. I wouldn't call him a good pick in 2013. But then again, De Clercq was just an example.
Besides, I have Atapuma myself, so that's not the point I'm making. Having a rider who scored some points already is nice, because of the points and the fact that you can see his winter wasn't all that bad. But on the other hand it doesn't tell you anything about the future, so after maybe 1% off all the race days this season I don't think you can already make any conclusion, as anything can happen.
NairoQ said:So Zubeldia will have a great year while Betancur is over his top already?
Atapuma looks good indeed, but just for now. It's to early for any conclusions, De Clercq didn't have a wonderful season last year, did he?
Netserk said:Seems like Ewan at best will be a decent pick with limited profit![]()
ItalianGigolo said:Gerrans almost ties his 511 points from 2013. I'm so happy I picked him and Quintana.
jsem94 said:Argh. Feels like there's no chance left for anyone without Gerrans at this point.
LaFlorecita said:You could say that about every rider that scores really well. I don't believe in it. You don't win the game with 1 or 2 or 3 riders but with your whole team.
Having said that, I do wish I had picked Gerrans. I considered him but didn't realize there was such a huge number of points up for grabs for him in Ozland.
Ferminal said:How many of the top20 had Quintana last year? Think he was picked ~30 times.
Pentacycle said:A sixth place in San Luis would be a great result for my unique pick Sepulveda. And of course I encourage him to continue like that for the rest of 2014.![]()