I feel the exact opposite 😁Re: cheaper riders - am I the only one who feels like the 100-200 range is particularly stacked this year? Stands out even more to me because I can’t find many options I like in the double digits and especially the 200s.
I feel the exact opposite 😁Re: cheaper riders - am I the only one who feels like the 100-200 range is particularly stacked this year? Stands out even more to me because I can’t find many options I like in the double digits and especially the 200s.
I am down to a rather long shortlist of 69 riders. 16 of those are in the 100-200 range, while 12 are in the 200-300 range. I actually find it extremly difficult to put together a team for 2024. Cannot find any obvious picks that would be in over 80 % of the teams, so probably missing out of one or two obvious ones...I feel the exact opposite 😁
You call that long?I am down to a rather long shortlist of 69 riders.
It already is. And I like it more than my last year's team. It was surprisingly easy to complete, not many of "I would also really like to have this guy in my team but I'm out of budget/space" situations I often get in these games.My team isn't fully ready, yet
So I'm mainly going by numbers, guesswork, feels and some patriotism.
Well, my mother is Norwegian.Can't be that much, though. Decent Swedish riders are hard to come by these days.
haha. I was wondering about that myself. I do wish there were a few more swedish riders though.Well, my mother is Norwegian.
Glad to have you in this year. You are probably in the same boat as many of us. And this boat will stay afloat. I find myself hanging on to riders that are getting a little older. But i know their names and what they have done and they cant all be Sagan of the last 3 years.I haven't really had a problem finding riders but my problem is that I haven't followed the sport closely enough in the past years so I have no idea who many of the lesser known riders are and who is about to explode and who is a dud. So I'm mainly going by numbers, guesswork, feels and some patriotism.
I'm sure I'll end up missing out on some obvious choices that people will be picking but hopefully it will still be fun to follow the year and hopefully I'll have a better leg to stand on for next year.
Ya, I don't know what's going on there. A lot of the last decent batch of Swedish riders including Thomas Löfkvist, Gustav Larsson, Fredrik Kessiakoff all came through a continental team called Team Crescent (later Team Bianchi Scandinavia) led by Tommy Prim but that was like 20 years ago now and since then it has been pretty dismal with only a pro here or there at times like Tobias Ludvigsson. The last swede to crack the top 200 in CQrankings was Fredrik Kessiakoff in 2012.haha. I was wondering about that myself. I do wish there were a few more swedish riders though.
Yes, before I lost my longlist, remember thinking that there seemed to be fewer riders I was excited to follow than usual. Maybe because, as Anderis said, there's of lot of GC riders this year and am more of one-day fan? Will see how it looks as I put together a new one, and all my biases come into play when it comes to the final selections.I have to say that this is really hard this year. It is quite frustrating. I came up with 33 names. i dont love it but dont want to spend another two weeks stressing out over this.
Some random statistics: Riders from 17 different countries, way too many of them are British. Average age 23.5 years based on CQ download from November so probably close to 24 now. No riders over 1100 points and no riders below 0 points.
Mathematician's quibble: if you are going to claim an average age for your team, add 6 months to it, as the mean average age of a person reported as being (for example) 25 is 25 1/2.
I didn't really have the same impression but I checked the spreadsheet with my last year's team and it turns out I indeed have more riders from the 100-200 range than last year, which surprised me a bit.Re: cheaper riders - am I the only one who feels like the 100-200 range is particularly stacked this year? Stands out even more to me because I can’t find many options I like in the double digits and especially the 200s.
This is how I have done to calculate an average age for my team:Mathematician's quibble: if you are going to claim an average age for your team, add 6 months to it, as the mean average age of a person reported as being (for example) 25 is 25 1/2.
