Re:
fmk_RoI said:
You know, there is cheerleading on both sides of the debate. It's just that we tend to overlook the cheerleaders in our own ranks.
No. This - "both sides are equal" stuff won't fly here.
First of all, both sides cannot be right. Either doping is really powerful, or it isn't and any nobody can ride faster clean than on EPO just by "focusing" and "training harder".
In any case, in the current doping in cycling debate, one group has plenty of people who are for free speech and are willing to debate and consider every view point. They consider every point of discussion, explain exactly why they believe what they believe
The other side has 0 people who are willing to have a debate. People like Brailsfraud, walsh flat out refuse anything but a monologue. That's the only discussion format which allows them to claim "we made cycling clean" "we train harder than anyone else" or "everyone is now accepting our point of view" unchallenged.
To compare people like Tucker with Walsh is dishonest