The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:
Miburo said:Oh well shouldn't be surprised but I think it's maybe good to do it again. I think some people might have changed their opinion based on this year.
The Hitch said:It wont mean anything since it will all be based on wild guess work of what samus form is like.
Like Canc 2 injuries ruined his season so we havent seen him on top form in 1 and a half years.
Is he going to suck now that he turns 35? Probably, but its pure guesswork.
El Pistolero said:Cancellara had no injuries in 2011 yet didn't win a classic or a big time trial.
)
t's really not hard:
The Hitch said:It wont mean anything since it will all be based on wild guess work of what samus form is like.
Like Canc 2 injuries ruined his season so we havent seen him on top form in 1 and a half years.
Is he going to suck now that he turns 35? Probably, but its pure guesswork.
The Hitch said:Wtf has this got to do with anything?
this doesnt ask who has the better palmares but who is the better rider.
the 2 are not the same question. For example Nibali has a better palmares than Schleck but Schleck clearly is the better rider.
Oh and olympics is way bigger than a monument btw.
El Pistolero said:So Nibali is 6 years younger and already has a better palmares? I think that settles who the best all-round rider is.
The Hitch said:Wtf has this got to do with anything?
Nibali has a better palmares than Schleck but Schleck clearly is the better rider.
I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.woodenswan said:time will tell, but i'll go with Nibali.
Schleck is the better climber, no doubt about that, but Nibali is competitive in a huge variety of races, and far more consistent throughout a season
a poll perhaps?![]()
theyoungest said:I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.
theyoungest said:I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.
El Pistolero said:The question isn't who's the most talented, that is clearly Andy Schleck, but about who's the best overall rider.
theyoungest said:Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.