Oh well shouldn't be surprised but I think it's maybe good to do it again. I think some people might have changed their opinion based on this year.The Hitch said:
It wont mean anything since it will all be based on wild guess work of what samus form is like.Miburo said:Oh well shouldn't be surprised but I think it's maybe good to do it again. I think some people might have changed their opinion based on this year.
Cancellara had no injuries in 2011 yet didn't win a classic or a big time trial.The Hitch said:It wont mean anything since it will all be based on wild guess work of what samus form is like.
Like Canc 2 injuries ruined his season so we havent seen him on top form in 1 and a half years.
Is he going to suck now that he turns 35? Probably, but its pure guesswork.
Wtf has this got to do with anything?El Pistolero said:Cancellara had no injuries in 2011 yet didn't win a classic or a big time trial.
)
this doesnt ask who has the better palmares but who is the better rider.t's really not hard:
It's about people their opinion and it's interesting to see how it changed after this year. But anyways I didn't know there was a thread otherwise I wouldn't have made it so yeahThe Hitch said:It wont mean anything since it will all be based on wild guess work of what samus form is like.
Like Canc 2 injuries ruined his season so we havent seen him on top form in 1 and a half years.
Is he going to suck now that he turns 35? Probably, but its pure guesswork.
Just because you compete for the glory of your country and the title of Sir?The Hitch said:Wtf has this got to do with anything?
this doesnt ask who has the better palmares but who is the better rider.
the 2 are not the same question. For example Nibali has a better palmares than Schleck but Schleck clearly is the better rider.
Oh and olympics is way bigger than a monument btw.
different riders peak at differnet times. I have no doubt Nibali will eventually be a better rider than samu ever was but that is not the question.El Pistolero said:So Nibali is 6 years younger and already has a better palmares? I think that settles who the best all-round rider is.
The Hitch said:Wtf has this got to do with anything?
Nibali has a better palmares than Schleck but Schleck clearly is the better rider.
I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.woodenswan said:time will tell, but i'll go with Nibali.
Schleck is the better climber, no doubt about that, but Nibali is competitive in a huge variety of races, and far more consistent throughout a season
a poll perhaps?![]()
The question isn't who's the most talented, that is clearly Andy Schleck, but about who's the best overall rider.theyoungest said:I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.
nibali clearly improved his time trial this year. can we say the same about andy schleck?theyoungest said:I'd go with who's better at peak form. And that's clearly Schleck. Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.
exactlyEl Pistolero said:The question isn't who's the most talented, that is clearly Andy Schleck, but about who's the best overall rider.
Nibali has shown signs of improvement in that department.theyoungest said:Even in a time trial (in a GT) they're somewhat equal.