the sceptic said:
May? We have evidence that he doped with a TUE. So maybe you need to reconsider your love for everything sky? Where are your morals Martin?
No, you don't. You have evidence of a TUE, which both the governing body and WADA was happy with, and you don't believe in it. Fine. Your belief isn't all that important, oddly enough.
Doping is illegal use of drugs, or it's meaningless as a word. You may believe the TUE was obtained fraudulently, in which it case it would clearly be doping. And you are entitled to your belief, indeed it may even turn out to be correct - but I refer you back a few lines on how important your belief itself is.
As for my morals? Well, you are in no place to judge anybody's morals, so I'll treat that suggestion as it deserves.