The fun begins - SCA now asking for money back...

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

mountainrman

BANNED
Oct 17, 2012
385
0
0
jam pants said:
How's the discussion on that other forum you run^H^H^H visit?
Sorry to disappoint you , I don't visit other cycling forums.
I own a couple, and a lot of websites, nothing to do with any sport.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Moose McKnuckles said:
I have no idea how much Lance is actually worth, but the last time he sold a house, it wasn't worth anywhere close to that amount.

$7.5M is hardly a killer. Add $3M to ASO and now we have $10.5M. Not counting any continuing legal fees.

The problem is not “total wealth” but cashflow. Who has 10m cash sitting around? No one.
 
May 15, 2011
2,817
39
11,530
Whatever lance gets taken for it wont eat into his vast fortune, hes doen better out of cycling than anyone before and anyone down, contador and co have made pennys compared to this lad.

Cash flow isnt an issue your given time to come up with the cash and im sure he has some pretty liquid assets lying around.

The most serious charge he will face will be likely chargers for purging himself, something which may stop him from ever telling the truth.
 
May 5, 2009
696
1
0
thehog said:
The problem is not “total wealth” but cashflow. Who has 10m cash sitting around? No one.

I have. What's the problem?

Let's hope Lance has a good liquidity management.

One thing not to forget: If he is continuing the same way and misusing livestrong for his selfish purposes (to some extent), there's also more than $100m cash sitting around... no problem for his criminal lawyers to charge a bit of their costs to livestrong, paying some lobby-jerks for LA purposes, continuing to raise "Lance awareness", etc. Of course, it's limited to a certain extent as it is not his own money and he has stepped down as chairman, but if you are ****ed and are a *** and have already been prepared for anything before, ... remember livestrong had an entire boardmeeting just dedicated at how to screw Lemond...
 
Nov 20, 2010
786
0
0
[TQUOTE=Lukenwolf;1061094]Thos 10M will only be the beginning. What about USPS and Discovery Channel, who's image certainly has taken a hit now. What about all the people he silenced with faux lawsuits or otherwise bullied.
And there could still be a class action suit headed his way for people, who donated money to his livestrong scheme under false pretenses.[/QUOTE]

Livestrong donors are already demanding their donations back. The Landis qui tam case is for >$30 million. IIRC,bthere are provisions for punitive damages as well. Then there is the incresing likelihood of a criminal RICO case which would resultbin the seizure of all Armstrong's assets derived from his criminal enterprise. Not sure about the possibility of a civil RICO action. Armstrong will be living in a trailer wyen this is done. And what does this say about Armstrong's mother and the way she raised him?

Any comments yet from Sally Jenkins?
 

mountainrman

BANNED
Oct 17, 2012
385
0
0
Maxiton said:
Qui tam.

Âąê

Now the feds have dropped out, can you see that happening?

There seems to be a lack of will within the administration to take any of this forward, criminal or civil. I cannot see them wanting to line Landis's pockets either.

And - Has Quit Tam ever been used or successful in a case remotely resembling this?
 
Mar 11, 2009
10,062
1
22,485
Pay up to all comers.
It'll work out cheaper than continuing to fork out for his legion of inept legal beagles.:D
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Zultronova said:
I'm sure he can well afford to pay back the money. His net worth is supposed to be $125 million.

His net worth is not 125m in cash.

How much cash does he have thats not servicing loans and lifestyle?

Not a lot.
 
Mar 18, 2009
14,644
81
22,580
When do the class action suits start? There are lots of angry lemmings out there. Even if the suits are not successful, they will still cost him money to defend against.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Aleajactaest said:
I'm thinking that you and everyone else in all the money threads are pulling assumptions out of your asses.

Yes, it will cost him a lot of money. How much is unknowable at this time. Additionally, no one has any real idea of his current financial status. So, you have an equation with two unknowns and no basis to get known anytime soon.

Keep whistling in the dark if you want, I don't really care.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
mountainrman said:
I sincerely doubt it.

This SCA suit will be the "biggie" and as I have said - I suspect he will do a deal for a few mill to keep it out of court , which will cost him a house or a jet,

I doubt if Nike or the big sponsors will come at him, first because of a probable lack of legal grounds to do so, and also because as a popular sportsman he made them money at a guess,

I am guessing it would require an award of $tens millions, which process would take years if ever awarded to break Lance, and I cannot see who can come at him for more than 7 figures. Sunday times will have a go, so I suspect might LeMond, even ASO, but even in combination they are $10m. Lance was reportedly earning 8 figures a year in sponsorships.

It isn't just the awards, it's the legal bills to get there. Pobrecito!!!

ATTENTION EVERYONE!!!!

The new fanboy (and insane intertubes troll) tack is that Lance will not really suffer any financial hardship because of this. As they have been wrong about everything relating to this, we can now feel safe that he will certainly go bankrupt!
 
Feb 10, 2010
10,645
20
22,510
ChewbaccaD said:
It isn't just the awards, it's the legal bills to get there. Pobrecito!!!

ATTENTION EVERYONE!!!!

The new fanboy (and insane intertubes troll) tack is that Lance will not really suffer any financial hardship because of this. As they have been wrong about everything relating to this, we can now feel safe that he will certainly go bankrupt!

A mere flesh wound.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4 Go about 1:26 in.

I want you to be right. Let's hope you are right.
 
Jul 12, 2012
649
0
0
thehog said:
The problem is not “total wealth” but cashflow. Who has 10m cash sitting around? No one.

Saturday, a friend of my made a very valid argument that Armstrong probably has significant funds "offshore" that would be difficult for US courts to access.

Yes, he will probably need to sell tangible assets such as real estate and the jet, and probably at a loss. :D

However, the simple fact is that he will never be poor, or even middle-class.
 
Nov 20, 2010
786
0
0
mountainrman said:
Now the feds have dropped out, can you see that happening?

There seems to be a lack of will within the administration to take any of this forward, criminal or civil. I cannot see them wanting to line Landis's pockets either.

And - Has Quit Tam ever been used or successful in a case remotely resembling this?

The feds could very easily get back in it with a RICO complaint. If that happens, look for it to come out of a federal district court on the East coast.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Turner29 said:
Saturday, a friend of my made a very valid argument that Armstrong probably has significant funds "offshore" that would be difficult for US courts to access.

Yes, he will probably need to sell tangible assets such as real estate and the jet, and probably at a loss. :D

However, the simple fact is that he will never be poor, or even middle-class.

Probably correct, so we can have solace in the fact that he will also never be the Tour de France champion. Ever.

As a future attorney, I extend my congratulations to any and all attorneys who are in Lance's employ, or will be over the next few years. May the billable hours be with you brothers and sisters!!!
 
ChewbaccaD said:
Probably correct, so we can have solace in the fact that he will also never be the Tour de France champion. Ever.

As a future attorney, I extend my congratulations to any and all attorneys who are in Lance's employ, or will be over the next few years. May the billable hours be with you brothers and sisters!!!

Seedy business begets seedy business.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
Aleajactaest said:
Sure, whatever lets you sleep at night.

I'm not the biggest fraud in sporting history nor an idiotic fan of such a person, so I sleep just fine. Your results may vary.
 
May 27, 2012
6,458
0
0
rhubroma said:
Seedy business begets seedy business.

There is nothing seedy at all in providing legal representation. It is only those not currently in need who find it so onerous. Yet, once there is some disagreement or law broken, we become your best friends. If you think you don't need an attorney, try navigating court by yourself.

To all attorneys out there, stay thirsty my friends!