Viviani has a contract for next year and is going nowhere until after the Paris Olympics A favourite of Brailsford, told he was always welcome back when he originally left.Is there a one-friend rule for Ganna, so by adding Sobrero, INEOS can move on from Viviani?
He has 36 PCS points this year. His big (only) results this year are 3rd on stage 2 of Occitanie with very little competition, and 3rd on stage 3 of the Giro di Sicilia. He netted 295 PCS points last year, despite being the featured sprinter for INEOS. His 2021 with Cofidis was considered disappointing, but in fact, it seems unlikely he reaches 2021's total of 700 PCS points over the three years of his current contract.Viviani is a good fit for a team like Ineos. They don't really have a place in their squad to give a sprinter a proper support so I guess they're happy to have a sprinter who is not upset about not riding GTs and not having a proper train and stuff but still delivering some results on those flat days which are plenty on the calendar and where the team otherwsie would have been pretty aimless.
Although he's actually declined quite a bit recently, so it's not as good of a deal as it has been in the past but it's still better than having no sprinter at all or having a sprinter who's in bad mood because of lack of opportunities.
Viviani is a good fit for a team like Ineos. They don't really have a place in their squad to give a sprinter a proper support so I guess they're happy to have a sprinter who is not upset about not riding GTs and not having a proper train and stuff but still delivering some results on those flat days which are plenty on the calendar and where the team otherwsie would have been pretty aimless.
Although he's actually declined quite a bit recently, so it's not as good of a deal as it has been in the past but it's still better than having no sprinter at all or having a sprinter who's in bad mood because of lack of opportunities.
Viviani is a waste of space/budget, and I agree. However, he is a favorite of Brailsford, so he’ll pretty much be welcome there for how long he wants, which is sometimes what is comes down to in sports.I don't quite agree with that.
For a big budget team like Ineos, if they are going to have a sprinter, they should get one that can hit top 3 in bunch sprints with some consistency, and then dedicate 2-3 riders to be his train all year... someone with race smarts who doesn't need the full boat, like Girmay, Pedersen, Kooij or De Lie.
Problem is of course, that signing those kind of riders for a secondary position is hard, especially when they are told they won't get to ride most Grand Tours, so none of those would go to Ineos, they are just used as a reference on rider type.
But having someone like Viviani there, with no train to speak of, is pretty much a waste of budget IMO.
It all depends on who they could have instead.But having someone like Viviani there, with no train to speak of, is pretty much a waste of budget IMO.
You're setting unrealistic guidelines IMO. Ineos have way too much climbing talent to select a proper sprinter to a GT. You even acknowledged yourself that the riders you mention wouldn't be likely to sign for a secondary position. Why don't you give an example of riders who would, then? Perhaps because it's extremely difficult to find riders who match your criteria. And that's why Ineos isn't signing anyone like that IMO. Viviani was probably the closest you can get. Not so much in his 2023 form, admittedly, but he was a very sensible signing at the time based on the past performances IMO. It's not easy to sign good riders with few ambitions and an ambitious sprinter is not something that could have mixed well with Ineos' roster.For a big budget team like Ineos, if they are going to have a sprinter, they should get one that can hit top 3 in bunch sprints with some consistency, and then dedicate 2-3 riders to be his train all year... someone with race smarts who doesn't need the full boat, like Girmay, Pedersen, Kooij or De Lie.
Problem is of course, that signing those kind of riders for a secondary position is hard, especially when they are told they won't get to ride most Grand Tours, so none of those would go to Ineos, they are just used as a reference on rider type.
It all depends on who they could have instead.
You're setting unrealistic guidelines IMO. Ineos have way too much climbing talent to select a proper sprinter to a GT. You even acknowledged yourself that the riders you mention wouldn't be likely to sign for a secondary position. Why don't you give an example of riders who would, then? Perhaps because it's extremely difficult to find riders who match your criteria. And that's why Ineos isn't signing anyone like that IMO. Viviani was probably the closest you can get. Not so much in his 2023 form, admittedly, but he was a very sensible signing at the time based on the past performances IMO. It's not easy to sign good riders with few ambitions and an ambitious sprinter is not something that could have mixed well with Ineos' roster.
Both options make sense. Bora because he has been there before and Movistar because he has worked with both Piepoli and Patxi Vila before. Probably would get more chances to ride for himself in hilly one day races on both teams.
Before he went to Quickstep Viviani was actually a really solid sprinter there. Got podiums/stage wins in WT stage races and was willing to work for the team captain ( I remember him being a bottle carrier and working for the team captain before the final climb on the first week mountain stages of the 2015 Giro, while he was wearing the points jersey).No talented sprinter will sign with Ineos, as long as they can't supply a decent train and a decent race programme.
But it is far from impossible to combine the two... both Jumbo, Bahrain and UAE have fairly good sprinters, with fairly competent lead out riders, and they even get to ride some of the GT's.
The problem on Ineos IMO is they have far too many riders that see themselves as GC candidates, so they are almost forced to enter "GC focused" teams in all 3 Grand Tours.
The Bora version of Formolo was really entertaining.Both options make sense. Bora because he has been there before and Movistar because he has worked with both Piepoli and Patxi Vila before. Probably would get more chances to ride for himself in hilly one day races on both teams.
Looking at how he set up Pogacar's attack in Lombardia last year he's still really good at the end of a hard one day race.The Bora version of Formolo was really entertaining.
in a way, good, yeah, but just I checked the Tirreno coverage from a couple of years back when they did the same climb in the Giro this year, which had him flying up the climb. Now he looks more like Pieter Weening.Looking at how he set up Pogacar's attack in Lombardia last year he's still really good at the end of a hard one day race.
At the same time he was super strong and essential in 2 of Pogacar's most impressive performances in 2021. That Tirreno-Adriatico stage that Van der Poel won and the Le Grand-Bonard stage. Also set a tempo that cracked Roglic in LBL that year. When it's a race/stage that is mainly about endurance his skillset makes him the perfect superdomestique for Pogacar.in a way, good, yeah, but just I checked the Tirreno coverage from a couple of years back when they did the same climb in the Giro this year, which had him flying up the climb. Now he looks more like Pieter Weening.
So, you‘re saying he‘d be a good gravel racer?At the same time he was super strong and essential in 2 of Pogacar's most impressive performances in 2021. That Tirreno-Adriatico stage that Van der Poel won and the Le Grand-Bonard stage. Also set a tempo that cracked Roglic in LBL that year. When it's a race/stage that is mainly about endurance his skillset makes him the perfect superdomestique for Pogacar.
He was such a strange signing. A decent Pro level sprinter in the French or Belgian Cup, hardly any of which of Ineos rode. The only vague justification for it seemed to be giving their classics squad something to do after April, as there wasn't much else in their calendar. Ben Turner spent a lot of last season as his leadout man, resulting in a few podiums in .1 stage races.Viviani is a waste of space/budget, and I agree. However, he is a favorite of Brailsford, so he’ll pretty much be welcome there for how long he wants, which is sometimes what is comes down to in sports.
Before he went to Quickstep Viviani was actually a really solid sprinter there. Got podiums/stage wins in WT stage races and was willing to work for the team captain ( I remember him being a bottle carrier and working for the team captain before the final climb on the first week mountain stages of the 2015 Giro, while he was wearing the points jersey).
Oh yeah, I dond't disagree with you on that one at all.I'm not hating on Viviani, at one point he was the best sprinters in the peloton, but he isn't anymore and doesn't make sense on a big budget team, with next to no support.
I had assumed Ineos were doing Pinarello a solid by keeping him on a top tier team until the 2024 Olympics. Ineos have let him ride with the Italian National team in some of the Italian races.I'm not hating on Viviani, at one point he was the best sprinters in the peloton, but he isn't anymore and doesn't make sense on a big budget team, with next to no support.
I think Viviani profited massively from Quickstep's leadout train, like others have done before and after him. I'm not sure he ever was the best sprinter, but he was on the best team for a sprinter. He certainly isn't now.I'm not hating on Viviani, at one point he was the best sprinters in the peloton, but he isn't anymore and doesn't make sense on a big budget team, with next to no support.
He did really well at Sky in his final year when they didn't really have a leadout train. Now they do as they've signed a lot of classics riders in the last 2 years, but haven't altered their calendar accordingly so they're not really doing much after spring. Viviani had a lot of support last year.I think Viviani profited massively from Quickstep's leadout train, like others have done before and after him. I'm not sure he ever was the best sprinter, but he was on the best team for a sprinter. He certainly isn't now.
I think I have read this earlier somewhere. Maybe in this thread.