Pantani_lives said:What's more likely to happen on Thursday?
A. Jens Voight breaks the hour record.
B. Scotland votes for independence.
A= 100% certain.
Areo bike and two discs. Hell JRod would break that record on a good day
Pantani_lives said:What's more likely to happen on Thursday?
A. Jens Voight breaks the hour record.
B. Scotland votes for independence.
Pantani_lives said:What's more likely to happen on Thursday?
A. Jens Voight breaks the hour record.
B. Scotland votes for independence.
avanti said:Why not? It is good for Jens, good for Trek, good for TV coverage, and good for cycling (especially track racing). It will be the beginning of a blitz on the hour record around the world. Oh yes - good for cycling fans - I once watched a successful hour record attempt; it was a great experience.
contador977 said:The hour record at the end of a career by a 40+ yr old? I dont understand the logic here. A 60 minute Trek TV commercial is what this is.
Bavarianrider said:A= 100% certain.
Areo bike and two discs. Hell JRod would break that record on a good day
King Boonen said:I consider the fans conservative. Always harking back to the past and wanting to compare everything to the riders who have come before. That's fine, but it shouldn't get in the way of allowing the sport to progress.
King Boonen said:What about carbon frames? Or even aluminium ones? It seems very obvious what technology and advances should be allowed and want shouldn't. making comments about motors is just hyperbole.
Koba80 said:I also agree with the whole anti-Merckx thing. If riders were allowed the cocktail of clinic things he was on, his record would be nothing, there has to be a point where arbitrariness becomes exact.
Echoes said:Fans conservative, really? How many fans are denouncing the Cookson reform like I do.
I'm not really comparing - though the Hour record is a contest that of necessity forces us to compare -, just wish we could keep the rule that had stood for a century.
Though in the end, I very much agree with Lewis Mumford when he said that "Progress was the deadest of dead ideas."
Again I don't recall the UCI making any fuss about the transition to carbon frames in the 1990's but I might have missed something. As far as I know there's nothing in the UCI ruling that goes against it.
My comments about the engine was just pushing the theory to its extreme. In my opinion, aerodynamic devices and engines should be treated just the same. In 1914 like in 1984 they were banned according to the same article, that I mentioned above.
I thought that this kind of unfounded allegations were not allowed on this section.
I've myself refrained from saying what I thought of Sosenka, so I should expect the same from anybody, or drop this rule, mods. I cannot be the only one to respect that rule!
richwagmn said:I think Jens will probably do it.
More importantly, Trek and Jens will have helped rekindle interest in the hour record. And you know that Martin,Wiggins,Cancellara,etc are going to be thinking about an attempt after this very seriously.
All in all, it's good for cycling IMO.
HSNHSN said:I read through all pages so far and there's one question that does not seem to be addressed at all. It seems to be generally believed this is going to be a one-hour (+) Trek commercial. Can't it also be the case that all of this is preparation to Cancellara having a go at it, somewhere next year?
Alex Simmons/RST said:So what you're saying is it's really a 2-hour Trek commercial.
Captain Serious said:Jens has got no hope if he rides in s-bends, like he normally does.![]()
Alex Simmons/RST said:So what you're saying is it's really a 2-hour Trek commercial.
Vino attacks everyone said:when is he scheduled to ride?
Vino attacks everyone said:when is he scheduled to ride?