The Lance Deposition Tapes (Complete Testimony Now Available)

Page 4 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
fatandfast said:
The East African land snail is native to East Africa, especially Kenya and Tanzania. Its habitat includes most regions of the humid tropics, including many Pacific islands, southern and eastern Asia, and the Caribbean. It is a highly invasive species, and colonies can be formed from a single gravid individual. The species has established itself in temperate climates also, and in many places release into the wild is illegal. The giant snail can now be found in agricultural areas, coastland, natural forest, planted forests, riparian zones, scrub/shrublands, urban areas, and wetlands.Achatina fulica in Hyderabad, India.The giant East African snail is a macrophytophagous herbivore; it eats a wide range of plant material, fruit and vegetables. It will sometimes eat sand, very small stones, bones from carcasses and even concrete as calcium sources for its shell. In rare instances the snails will consume each other. In captivity, this species can be fed on grain products such as bread, digestive biscuits and chicken feed. Fruits and vegetables must be washed diligently as the snail is very sensitive to any lingering pesticides.[citation needed] In captivity, snails need cuttlebone to aid the growth and strength for their shells. As with all molluscs, they enjoy the yeast in beer, which serves as a growth stimulus. The Giant East African Snail is a simultaneous hermaphrodite; each individual has both testes and ovaries and is capable of producing both sperm and ova. Instances of self fertilisation are rare, occurring only in small populations. Although both snails in a mating pair can simultaneously transfer gametes to each other (bilateral mating), this is dependent on the size difference between the partners. Snails of similar size will reproduce in this way.
Another brilliant analysis...
 
Dec 7, 2010
8,770
3
0
Granville57 said:
Another brilliant analysis...

LMAO at your post and the reply quotes you had. That land snail is very interesting, and I had to scroll back up to make sure that he did not write that. You got me!:D
 
Jul 14, 2009
2,498
0
0
Digger said:
Lol you are so clueless it's actually funny.
Firstly Landis witnessed the team doping on the bus, Frankie was retired at that stage. :rolleyes:
Frankie's contempt? Why? Because he tells the truth. :rolleyes:

The roll eyes thing is cool. But the clues are laid out by Landis he says there was system..not only on the bus. He explained a tradition of doping. I do not think the Andreau's are lying.. period. I think that there was a climate far more serious than bike racing while Lance was in the hospital. I also think that they were considerate to visit Lance on what could have been his death bed. Overall nice people.. obviously not slinging mud Armstrong's way for financial gain. He told them something in the hospital face to face in a weak moment and he wants to retract the un-retractable. I have friends that used in Japan, Belgium and the US as part of trying to have a cycling career. Nobody got caught (yet..)
This obsession on putting Lance's human feet on the ground is dumb. The guy is done with racing and he was not caught. The poisonous passion feel for trying to slay him is weird to me. Everybody I know that used did so not to lose their car,condo or future..more to survive than to cash any big prize money check.

Frankie may be asked about the dope use at US.Postal how could he not be asked? If he is asked a specific question he should give a specific answer. If they have to grind him into human waste it would appear an exercise in bringing up his history. Life would be all flowers and puppy dogs if "Was that the first time you had been to Lance's bedside during his cancer treatment?" was the type of question he will be asked..Andreau was a big part of Postal and and the Landis claim that there was along standing pattern can be re enforced or dismissed by Frankie. Yes I think Lance is a punk..but he didn't get caught and that just has people bonkers..
 
fatandfast said:
The roll eyes thing is cool. But the clues are laid out by Landis he says there was system..not only on the bus. He explained a tradition of doping. I do not think the Andreau's are lying.. period. I think that there was a climate far more serious than bike racing while Lance was in the hospital. I also think that they were considerate to visit Lance on what could have been his death bed. Overall nice people.. obviously not slinging mud Armstrong's way for financial gain. He told them something in the hospital face to face in a weak moment and he wants to retract the un-retractable. I have friends that used in Japan, Belgium and the US as part of trying to have a cycling career. Nobody got caught (yet..)
This obsession on putting Lance's human feet on the ground is dumb. The guy is done with racing and he was not caught. The poisonous passion feel for trying to slay him is weird to me. Everybody I know that used did so not to lose their car,condo or future..more to survive than to cash any big prize money check.

Frankie may be asked about the dope use at US.Postal how could he not be asked? If he is asked a specific question he should give a specific answer. If they have to grind him into human waste it would appear an exercise in bringing up his history. Life would be all flowers and puppy dogs if "Was that the first time you had been to Lance's bedside during his cancer treatment?" was the type of question he will be asked..Andreau was a big part of Postal and and the Landis claim that there was along standing pattern can be re enforced or dismissed by Frankie. Yes I think Lance is a punk..but he didn't get caught and that just has people bonkers..

Frankie told the truth...he told the truth about Ferrari...he hasn't sold his story nor has Beth. They were asked to testify, could not avoid it. He told the truth about his own usage, about his experiences on the team and the hospital room. You tell me where the Andreus have gained financially from all of this.
 
Jul 6, 2010
2,340
0
0
fatandfast said:
The roll eyes thing is cool. But the clues are laid out by Landis he says there was system..not only on the bus. He explained a tradition of doping. I do not think the Andreau's are lying.. period. I think that there was a climate far more serious than bike racing while Lance was in the hospital. I also think that they were considerate to visit Lance on what could have been his death bed. Overall nice people.. obviously not slinging mud Armstrong's way for financial gain. He told them something in the hospital face to face in a weak moment and he wants to retract the un-retractable. I have friends that used in Japan, Belgium and the US as part of trying to have a cycling career. Nobody got caught (yet..)
This obsession on putting Lance's human feet on the ground is dumb. The guy is done with racing and he was not caught. The poisonous passion feel for trying to slay him is weird to me. Everybody I know that used did so not to lose their car,condo or future..more to survive than to cash any big prize money check.

Frankie may be asked about the dope use at US.Postal how could he not be asked? If he is asked a specific question he should give a specific answer. If they have to grind him into human waste it would appear an exercise in bringing up his history. Life would be all flowers and puppy dogs if "Was that the first time you had been to Lance's bedside during his cancer treatment?" was the type of question he will be asked..Andreau was a big part of Postal and and the Landis claim that there was along standing pattern can be re enforced or dismissed by Frankie. Yes I think Lance is a punk..but he didn't get caught and that just has people bonkers..

Hey! Back to the snails! Your cycling posts are boring...
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
fatandfast said:
The roll eyes thing is cool. But the clues are laid out by Landis he says there was system..not only on the bus. He explained a tradition of doping. I do not think the Andreau's are lying.. period. I think that there was a climate far more serious than bike racing while Lance was in the hospital. I also think that they were considerate to visit Lance on what could have been his death bed. Overall nice people.. obviously not slinging mud Armstrong's way for financial gain. He told them something in the hospital face to face in a weak moment and he wants to retract the un-retractable. I have friends that used in Japan, Belgium and the US as part of trying to have a cycling career. Nobody got caught (yet..)
This obsession on putting Lance's human feet on the ground is dumb. The guy is done with racing and he was not caught. The poisonous passion feel for trying to slay him is weird to me. Everybody I know that used did so not to lose their car,condo or future..more to survive than to cash any big prize money check.

Frankie may be asked about the dope use at US.Postal how could he not be asked? If he is asked a specific question he should give a specific answer. If they have to grind him into human waste it would appear an exercise in bringing up his history. Life would be all flowers and puppy dogs if "Was that the first time you had been to Lance's bedside during his cancer treatment?" was the type of question he will be asked..Andreau was a big part of Postal and and the Landis claim that there was along standing pattern can be re enforced or dismissed by Frankie. Yes I think Lance is a punk..but he didn't get caught and that just has people bonkers..

Hard to get caught when you divert some of the money you got in to the hands of those who are meant to be catching you.
But don't worry Lance will have his day.......

As for Frankie - again, as you appear to have missed it, he has already spoken to the investigation and waived his right to have a lawyer present.
I am sure Frankie was asked about his career - why would he be ground in to 'human waste' when his doping is already public knowledge?
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Susan Westemeyer said:
I'm glad I finished my glass of wine before I read that post, I would have hated to snort it out all over my laptop. Great posting, Granville.

Time for a refill....

Susan

cheers, Susan, i'm right there with you :p

and a huge thank you, Granville... absolutely brilliant! the little snail deserved it.
 
fatandfast said:
Frankie did you ever use drugs for pleasure or was it always to cheat the racers,promoter and your employer? Do you think that VS or VN TV should have a disclaimer saying that the network often hires ex-drug users to comment on big bike races ? This new way of coming out of the closet is great.

fatandfast said:
Frankie admitted he used drugs..he should have to go into detail about how and what he squirted into himself..after all his story of system and acceptance will need to be compared to Landis's positively false version. I hope the downside for the Andreau's is steep and slippery .

fatandfast said:
He is also an admitted drug user. He used drugs while on the job and for financial gain. He used them in such a way as to avoided detection and in violation of a few written contracts that he signed with his employer,race promoters and race organizers.

fatandfast said:
Frankie will come to find that talking heads for US cycling coverage are pretty easy to come by and that a guy in the news for the wrong reasons will probably be passed over for some other 7-11 or Coors Light rider that can hold a microphone.

Mr.Andreau's contempt for the rule of law could be explored as part of his character makeup as to how often he tells the truth.

fatandfast said:
Frankie may be asked about the dope use at US.Postal how could he not be asked? If he is asked a specific question he should give a specific answer. If they have to grind him into human waste it would appear an exercise in bringing up his history.

Considering Frankie almost never talks publicly about any of this, doesn't post here, and only testified under oath when compelled to do so, you sure have one big hardon for him.

Plus, you sure seem rather fixated on his future employability. If I didn't know better, I'd think some of those comments were thinly veilied threats about some effort to "out" him to his current and future employers. Smells an awful lot like a smear campaign in it's infancy...

I really think you need to seek some professional help, and soon.
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
MacRoadie said:
Considering Frankie almost never talks publicly about any of this, doesn't post here, and only testified under oath when compelled to do so, you sure have one big hardon for him.

Plus, you sure seem rather fixated on his future employability. If I didn't know better, I'd think some of those comments were thinly veilied threats about some effort to "out" him to his current and future employers. Smells an awful lot like a smear campaign in it's infancy...

I really think you need to seek some professional help, and soon.

I was thinking exactly the same thing.

Fastandfast is most definitely issuing threats to Mr Andreu. And I hope that the mods are smart enough to pick up on it. And I'm going to write to them right now.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Cheat Or Be Cheated said:
Releasing the Clinton tapes backfired. People knew he was lying but he seemed like a nice and reasonable guy so they didn't really care.
Problem here is Armstrong does not come across as a "nice or reasonable guy".
 
BotanyBay said:
I was thinking exactly the same thing.

Fastandfast is most definitely issuing threats to Mr Andreu. And I hope that the mods are smart enough to pick up on it. And I'm going to write to them right now.

I missed this nugget:

Poor Frankie, if he has to blab for the federal monkeys he will certainly lose his TV gig. Lance's legal team will make sure that Andreau's drug taking history and timeline are accurate.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
MacRoadie said:
I missed this nugget:
i do hope they shut him up -- Fatandfast, i mean.

witness tampering isn't right in any circumstance (illegal even) and certainly doesn't belong on this forum.
 
Oct 25, 2010
3,049
2
0
MacRoadie said:
I missed this nugget:

He's not only trying to intimidate Frankie, but Betsy as well.

I'm not sure I understand what FastandFast thinks he's going to accomplish by suggesting a retaliation for testimony that he gave many years ago.

But I can see that he has most certainly been using a virtual manner of punching his palm to make sure they get the message. It reminds me of Floyd's manager calling Lemond's cell phone.

And people don't think Lance's people are here.
 
May 13, 2009
305
0
0
this_is_edie said:
that turn of phrase is very interesting. Could it be that he was coached to answer that way so as to not incur perjury charges in the future?

Same thing I picked up on too. Having been able to observe court proceedings numerous times, that looks like coaching and preparation to me! Then again I am just the peanut gallery. How I would love to be a fly on the wall of a brainstorming meeting between LA and his legal team.


....great post granville, by far post of the day.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Cheat Or Be Cheated said:
But he does come across as smart. And when someone is being questioned they can look like the victim who is having to put up with crap over something that seems more trivial when it's openly talked about rather than read about in a newspaper. Does that make sense? I think that's what helped Clinton.


I disagree. You may be confusing smart with arrogant.

When I think of smart people, or even smart professional cyclists, Lance does not come to mind.
 

Yeahright

BANNED
Jan 29, 2011
115
0
0
Having just watched the snippets from the velocity site I don't think they are particularly illuminating. He answers the hospital question well and actually puts it back on the guy doing the questioning quite well. Bit vague on the reason for calling Frankie; could be lying, I did notice a bit of hard swallowing when he was searching for an answer there but not really an earth shattering moment.

Not sure how Hog could make his "nasty man' comments based solely on what the videos showed, was pretty much the standard responses that you would expect in a cross examination.

The other thing to note of course is that these excerpts were carefully edited. Would need to see the whole deposition recording to make a really valid judgement. You could excerpt most cross examinations to make the subject look bad. This is about 2 minutes of what was probably a long session.