Why on Earth would you think that?!Based on that information I would think that MVDP is going to focus a lot more on mountainbike next year for the olympic games.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Why on Earth would you think that?!Based on that information I would think that MVDP is going to focus a lot more on mountainbike next year for the olympic games.
Are you being sarcastic? As in, it's obvious he's going to focus more on mountainbike next year? Because sure we know he needs to fight for a proper place on the start grid of the OS, but there's a difference between riding A LOT of mountainbike races and maybe even skipping big classics like RoubaixWhy on Earth would you think that?!
Are you being sarcastic? As in, it's obvious he's going to focus more on mountainbike next year? Because sure we know he needs to fight for a proper place on the start grid of the OS, but there's a difference between riding A LOT of mountainbike races and maybe even skipping big classics like Roubaix
I'm not. I think the first four words I quoted are a nonsensical basis for your inference.Are you being sarcastic? As in, it's obvious he's going to focus more on mountainbike next year? Because sure we know he needs to fight for a proper place on the start grid of the OS, but there's a difference between riding A LOT of mountainbike races and maybe even skipping big classics like Roubaix
I wouldn't already say Philipsen can go for Roubaix as the leader if MVDP, the better rider, the winner of the last Roubaix, wouldn't make it a target.I'm not. I think the first four words I quoted are a nonsensical basis for your inference.
MTB field is ***. He can win those races when he is 35. Road is where it's at now.
Don't you agree??
MTB is cyclo-cross level.Not really!! How much MTB do you watch? It would seem not a lot..... The level of ignorance from road fans never fails to surprise!
Well Peraud was even older when he podiumed the TdF, so not a great example.MTB is cyclo-cross level.
Even ancient Peraud performed there.
The sport simply isn't big enough.
It's way better than gravel where any decent road racer can mop up the field but mtb will be a lot easier for MvdP than road racing.
Yes, but I would also say that is easier to be a contender in MTB as a +30 rider than on the road, especially nowadays, because the body adaptations that occur as someone grows old are more conducive to success in MTB than on the road.Not really!! How much MTB do you watch? It would seem not a lot..... The level of ignorance from road fans never fails to surprise.
You mean he was older then than he is now? sounds like some suspicious time travel is happeningWell Peraud was even older when he podiumed the TdF, so not a great example.
We've just seen Milan Vader win a WT stage race. It's no wonder he's found his return to racing on the road a whole lot easier than on the mountainbike, where earlier this year he struggled to even follow the pack. The intensity is way higher.MTB is cyclo-cross level.
Even ancient Peraud performed there.
The sport simply isn't big enough.
It's way better than gravel where any decent road racer can mop up the field but mtb will be a lot easier for MvdP than road racing.
It's comparable as far as D+ goes, 2888 (Glasgow) and 2777 (Paris). However, it's much less twisty and bendy, it has a lot of long straight roads and only the last +/- 50 kilometers are done on a circuit. Especially the former two make it a completely different race, as all riders spoke of Glasgow as one of the hardest race because of how many bends it had.I think for MVDP it will actually also be easier to become Olympic champion on the road than on the mountainbike. On the road he's probably already the overwhelming favourite, haven't looked at the course but I assume it will be a bit like Glasgow.
He has a bigger chance to win the MTB one, imo, because if he is the strongest in the race he likely wins.I'm still not so sure at all if MvdP will go all out for MTB next season. Competing in Paris means having to score loads of points throughout the season and watering down on the ambitions of his classics season is something the sponsor will not like.
In the end of this interview (in Dutch), he is reserving judgement on whether or not he think this is feasible.
Van der Poel verkent olympisch mountainbikeparcours: 'Gaat nog een flinke puzzel worden'
Mathieu van der Poel liet het EK op de VAM-berg schieten voor het olympische testevent in Parijs op de mountainbike. Van de ene vuilnisbelt naar de andere. En niet alle toppers zijn te spreken over het parcours.nos.nl
I honestly struggle to think that he will not defend is title in PR. Of course given how strong Philipsen was this year, he is entitled to be coleader.In an interview with Sporza, Philipsen said that managements expects him to go for Roubaix. Based on that information I would think that MVDP is going to focus a lot more on mountainbike next year for the olympic games. I don't really know the mountainbike calendar that well. Is there a big collision with the spring classics calendar?
Yesterday the UCI revealed the schedule for MTB races. None of these collide with spring classics, because Paris-Roubaix is the 7th of april.
12 - 14 april: Mairipora (Brazilië)
19 - 21 april: Araxa (Brazilië)
24 - 26 mei: Nove Mesto (Tsjechië)
14 - 16 juni: Val di Sole (Italië)
21 - 23 juni: Crans Montana (Italië)
28 juni - 7 juli: Haute-Savoie (Frankrijk)
27 - 29 september: Lake Placid (Verenigde Staten)
4 - 6 oktober: Monte-Sainte-Anne (Canada)
I very much doubt that he has a bigger chance of winning MTB versus road race. On a very curvy, long hard race on a street circuit with Montmarte as a punchy hill the route has MvdP written all over it. On MTB it's quite a question mark if he'll hit that 2019 level again, on longer road races on circuits like this he's the very best.He has a bigger chance to win the MTB one, imo, because if he is the strongest in the race he likely wins.
RR will depend much more on luck and things going perfectly. A lot less riders and teams are smaller, than normally. It becomes very unpredictable and it will be very difficult to save your matches for a decisive attack. High chance of being caught out and someone is gone.
And sponsor-wise... it is really only MSR, Ronde and PR that he needs to be on the starting line-up for. He only did SB, T-A, MSR, E3, Ronde, Scheldeprijs and PR this spring. Half of these was also just prep.
Ok.I very much doubt that he has a bigger chance of winning MTB versus road race. On a very curvy, long hard race with Montmarte as a punchy hill the route has MvdP written all over it. On MTB it's quite a question mark if he'll hit that 2019 level again, on longer road races on circuits like this he's the very best.
I think you’re leaving out the base probability here: there will be some big favs for the RR but the total number of riders who have a reasonable chance to win (20?) will be higher than the number of MTB competitors with a reasonable chance to win.I very much doubt that he has a bigger chance of winning MTB versus road race. On a very curvy, long hard race on a street circuit with Montmarte as a punchy hill the route has MvdP written all over it. On MTB it's quite a question mark if he'll hit that 2019 level again, on longer road races on circuits like this he's the very best.
And I thought Juri Sagan got the short end of the stick...Brother David has retired from professional cycling.