Zoef-Lightning
BANNED
The point is, that Vdp was beaten twice by Van Aert in Tirreno. And vice-versa. But only the defeats of Van Aert were used as an argument. And that's not a fair discussion.Winning two stages as well...
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The point is, that Vdp was beaten twice by Van Aert in Tirreno. And vice-versa. But only the defeats of Van Aert were used as an argument. And that's not a fair discussion.Winning two stages as well...
I didn't miss "the Mathieu's wins" in that same Tirreno. My point is/was that "the Wout wins" were forgotten in the same stage race. You can't use a defeat of one contender as an argument, and "forgot" to mention the defeat of the other contender, even in the same stage race (Tirreno). That's not fair.Unsurprisingly, the reverse is also true for van Aert fans. Whenever Mathieu beats Wout it's always because of "x" excuse, so let's not act like it's only exclusive to Mathieu fans.
Regardless, comparing VdP and Wout in disciplines exclusive to the road where the one is obviously hyper focussed on said terrain and well-trained in a team who invests a lot of capital in maximizing output in said disciplines while the other is either not interested (Mathieu has always maintained that he isn't a climber and wasn't interested in becoming a GC specialist) or has to make choices in order to combine all of the cycling disciplines on different terrains is just silly. Not to mention that tt'ing, longer sprints and climbing (longer climbs) are specifically suited to Wout's talents (sustained efforts).
It would be just as silly to judge Wout's talent vs Mathieu's if the former would suddenly start doing XCO races or purely based on finishes that are explosive (short/steep climbs/sprints) and thus more suited to Mathieu's talents or on impressive solo's or even in CX these past few seasons.
When either Mathieu starts being 100% focussed and dedicated to the road or Wout starts combining the same disciplines as Mathieu does only then can we make a proper comparison between the two. Even then there remains the intrinsic difference in talent between the two; sustained effort vs explosiveness. This difference is highlighted in CX races.
For all of your examples where Wout beat Mathieu there's a plethora of examples where the opposite was true. It's just all silly fanaticism.
They are both amazing talents but once they started racing outside of CX the direct comparison has become fairly moot as there is undoubtedly a trade-off in being focussed on one terrain vs combining different ones.
Let's just enjoy both of their talents while they're still here.
Btw, seems you missed Mathieu's wins in that same Tirreno you speak of.
He said to van der Hoorn that he will ride Impanis (Primus Classic) and Isbergues next week.
During a ride? That would be funny.
I don’t understand why you’re so bothered by it. Fact is van der poel beat Wout twice in Tirreno, fact is also that Wout beat Mathieu twice in Tirreno. Depending on what point you’re trying to make you can use the one without necessarily mentioning the other. Y’all get so pressed over nothing.I didn't miss "the Mathieu's wins" in that same Tirreno. My point is/was that "the Wout wins" were forgotten in the same stage race. You can't use a defeat of one contender as an argument, and "forgot" to mention the defeat of the other contender, even in the same stage race (Tirreno). That's not fair.
What does the first point have to do with the rest? Failed in his retro kit then went on to smoke everyone and get the yellow for longer than anyone expected.26 June 2021 - First stage Tour de France - MvdP fails in his retro kit
26 July 2021 - MTB Olympics - MvdP crashes hard due to own mistake
26 August 2021 - MTB World Championships - MvdP has to cancel due to injury
26 September 2021 - World's Race Race - ???
Well, you might be right. Honestly, I am of two minds. They're slinging BS to come in as low pressure/under the radar as possible (I mean, given he is van der Poel), even if he did have a back issue. Or, for whatever reason, he is doing something that I would consider brash and perhaps a bit dumb. Both are equally plausible.I'm going to start taking the statements about the back pain with a pinch of salt tbh and will clear my mind about that after the Worlds.
Yes, he is probably with some troubles with his back, which probably made him readjust his program. But, even for VDP, I don't expect to see someone who presumably couldn't do more than 2 hours of training at a moderate pace come to a race, two months after the last in the middle of the season, and do the kind of ride he did. And the field wasn't stellar but we aren't talking about slouch riders either.
The conspiracy theorist in me can't stop thinking that this, in terms of pressure and perception, is perfect for him. He would be hands down one of the big favourites for the Worlds and all the eyes would be set on him. And with his strengths in a sprint, we would have a target on his back and no one would work with him in equal terms if they found them in a group with him as we've seen several times. Now, the focus is in Van Aert and Colbrelli and almost no one talks about him. Perfect for his race. And all the talk about the participation in the Worlds still not being certain? I have many doubts about that after his win. It could be true before the race but right now? Have a hard time believing it...
The team said today that he felt his back yesterday but nothing that wouldn't be expected on the day after a race (even more with an aggresive surface like the one featured in Antwerp Port Epic).
This is probably all rubbish, but I'm going to wait for the 26th. Probably that extra 1% will be missed but if things come down to be decided in a burst of power on one of the final climbs or if he arrives there and smokes everyone, I wouldn't be surprised with any of the outcomes.
I'm going to start taking the statements about the back pain with a pinch of salt tbh and will clear my mind about that after the Worlds.
Yes, he is probably with some troubles with his back, which probably made him readjust his program. But, even for VDP, I don't expect to see someone who presumably couldn't do more than 2 hours of training at a moderate pace come to a race, two months after the last in the middle of the season, and do the kind of ride he did. And the field wasn't stellar but we aren't talking about slouch riders either.
The conspiracy theorist in me can't stop thinking that this, in terms of pressure and perception, is perfect for him. He would be hands down one of the big favourites for the Worlds and all the eyes would be set on him. And with his strengths in a sprint, we would have a target on his back and no one would work with him in equal terms if they found them in a group with him as we've seen several times. Now, the focus is in Van Aert and Colbrelli and almost no one talks about him. Perfect for his race. And all the talk about the participation in the Worlds still not being certain? I have many doubts about that after his win. It could be true before the race but right now? Have a hard time believing it...
The team said today that he felt his back yesterday but nothing that wouldn't be expected on the day after a race (even more with an aggresive surface like the one featured in Antwerp Port Epic).
This is probably all rubbish, but I'm going to wait for the 26th. Probably that extra 1% will be missed but if things come down to be decided in a burst of power on one of the final climbs or if he arrives there and smokes everyone, I wouldn't be surprised with any of the outcomes.
What does the first point have to do with the rest? Failed in his retro kit then went on to smoke everyone and get the yellow for longer than anyone expected.
the 26th thing is bs.
All in all the one thing if he starts is he'll not be the top favorite for once. That goes to Van Aert (and Colbrelli in lesser sense). Could work out well.
That being said, Van Aert was the top favorite for Flanders as well but got smoked on the Kwaremont.. and a week before on the Tiegemberg of all places as well.
26/03/2021 He gets bamboozled by DQS in E3the 26th thing is bs.
Looking back on those excellent races (E3 and Flanders), I remember how Van der Poel tossed with his energies all race, allowing Asgreen to conserve energy on crucial sectors, which gave the Dane the edge at the end.
Perhaps this experience, plus his troubled run-in to the WC, will for once make Van der Poel choose to ride conservatively. Somehow i doubt it though...
26/03/2021 He gets bamboozled by DQS in E3
26/02/2021 No stage in UAE because of covid in the team
26/08/2020 Best man in the race on the EC but falls just short of the podium
26/05/2017 DNS in Baloise Belgium Tour
26/12/2016 Maybe his worst WC manche CX performance in his career
Coincidence? I think not
Looking back on those excellent races (E3 and Flanders), I remember how Van der Poel tossed with his energies all race, allowing Asgreen to conserve energy on crucial sectors, which gave the Dane the edge at the end.
I agree that van der Poel usually doesn't think much about how to preserve energy, he just races... but in the case of those two races Asgreen was simply in monster-monster form, and it wasn't because he saved energy... especially not at E3 (wasn't that the race where he rode on his own for half the race (exaggerating) and then just went again when he was caught?
Asgreen was very strong that week. A deserved winner of both races. But it's clear that his wins were far from inevitable, with Van der Poel (and Van Aert too) overexerting themselves unnecessarily during both races, as if they had forgotten about any limits to their energy levels
Rationally Wout and Mathieu might draw some hard lessons from their mistakes during the Flemish spring, but given their character and status as superfavourites (Asgreen having sunk back to near anonimity), it won't be so easy for them to ride cautiously, especially on their home roads. That's why this poor run-in might just be what's needed to convince MvdP to ride smartly. We'll see.
I don't know. I actually think E3 was inevitable, nobody else was on that level that day.
I don't know how to regard Asgreen for the Worlds. Maybe he had all of this year's glory in the spring. Or maybe he took it a bit more easy the rest of the year to put it all in for the WC...