whew! that was a LOT of reading. my chinese owned $0.02 u.s. treasurey bill's worth:
lacking a camera fixed on andy's chain, i cannot ascertain if it was a bad shift on the front chainrings, too much pedal pressure while shifting, or the combination of a shift while hitting the bump that lifted schlecklette's wheel off the ground that caused young andy to drop his chain.
the only one who knows what contador saw or did not see as he flew by andy is contador. i have no reason to doubt his explanation of what happened and what he, sanchez, and menchov did.
it is not alberto's "fault" that andy did not take more time before today. it is not alberto's fault that andy did not, would not, or could not attack during yesterday's trackstand stage. it is not alberto's "fault" that andy was isolated.
it *is* alberto's "fault" he was back in the pack and either caught napping or boxed in when schlecklette attacked...that's bike racing. vino covered the attack. when alberto did respond, whooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeee, he was flying in short order.
andy, isolated, waits until km from the top of the climb to attack.
guess he wasn't kidding yesterday when he said today he will be "all in."
anyways: i get the tradition of not attacking the yellow jersey under certain conditions, i understand sportsmanship. but really: at some point, ya gotta start racing. sometimes, stuff happens. when stuff happens at a critical point late in a race...well, the object of any competion is to WIN. if that can be done in a genteel and good sporting fashion, well, that is all fine and well. however, the time comes when ya gotta poop or get off the pot. andy waited a bit too long to get off the pot. as fate would have it...he got burned.
a few more thoughts on today's stage:
1. i've been reading this forum for years. i did not register until sometime during this years most excellent giro, which was emperical evidence that real grand tour bike racing is not yet dead. i registered because i was dying to jump into one of the more passionate ****ing matches. i wrote my scathing post...hit preview post, read it again...and wisely decided that while yeah, i did have something to say, i was more interested in addding fuel to the fire than expressing whatever it was i have forgotten about. i love this forum and the sometimes weeeeeeeeee too ummmmm..."passionate" back and forth. now, in person, i am no shrinking violet...i'd be trading sharp edged barbs and doing my best to argue why *i* (and everyone who agrees with me) am right and the know-nothings who disagree are wrong.
for reasons that escape me, i am quite adept at restraining my opinionated self in a forum. another way of putting it is "it's easy to be a a good sport when i write."
that said, and no offense intended: i can only imagine comments had contador waited for andy: "told you this stage was going to suck!" "told you it should have been a mountaintop finish!" "crimeny, what a great stage it could have been if only those last 25km had been chopped off!!"
2. i think sram should join forces with apple to invent the i-phone4 electronic shifting system.
3. everyone *except* me has missed THE story of the day: i am sure everyone remembers that just yesterday, andy told frank to call their mom to tell her he (andy) would be very careful to not take any risks on descents.
welllllllllllllllllllllll....alberto may be an unsporting, cut throat opportunist who thought nothing of taking advantage of young andy's bad luck BUT...he didn't lie to his mother.
bad andy. baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad andy!
apologies to all for the length of and tangents contained in this post. if i could ride and race a bike the way i can prattle on...i'd be the undisputed KING of pro cycling.
lacking a camera fixed on andy's chain, i cannot ascertain if it was a bad shift on the front chainrings, too much pedal pressure while shifting, or the combination of a shift while hitting the bump that lifted schlecklette's wheel off the ground that caused young andy to drop his chain.
the only one who knows what contador saw or did not see as he flew by andy is contador. i have no reason to doubt his explanation of what happened and what he, sanchez, and menchov did.
it is not alberto's "fault" that andy did not take more time before today. it is not alberto's fault that andy did not, would not, or could not attack during yesterday's trackstand stage. it is not alberto's "fault" that andy was isolated.
it *is* alberto's "fault" he was back in the pack and either caught napping or boxed in when schlecklette attacked...that's bike racing. vino covered the attack. when alberto did respond, whooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeee, he was flying in short order.
andy, isolated, waits until km from the top of the climb to attack.
guess he wasn't kidding yesterday when he said today he will be "all in."
anyways: i get the tradition of not attacking the yellow jersey under certain conditions, i understand sportsmanship. but really: at some point, ya gotta start racing. sometimes, stuff happens. when stuff happens at a critical point late in a race...well, the object of any competion is to WIN. if that can be done in a genteel and good sporting fashion, well, that is all fine and well. however, the time comes when ya gotta poop or get off the pot. andy waited a bit too long to get off the pot. as fate would have it...he got burned.
a few more thoughts on today's stage:
1. i've been reading this forum for years. i did not register until sometime during this years most excellent giro, which was emperical evidence that real grand tour bike racing is not yet dead. i registered because i was dying to jump into one of the more passionate ****ing matches. i wrote my scathing post...hit preview post, read it again...and wisely decided that while yeah, i did have something to say, i was more interested in addding fuel to the fire than expressing whatever it was i have forgotten about. i love this forum and the sometimes weeeeeeeeee too ummmmm..."passionate" back and forth. now, in person, i am no shrinking violet...i'd be trading sharp edged barbs and doing my best to argue why *i* (and everyone who agrees with me) am right and the know-nothings who disagree are wrong.
for reasons that escape me, i am quite adept at restraining my opinionated self in a forum. another way of putting it is "it's easy to be a a good sport when i write."
that said, and no offense intended: i can only imagine comments had contador waited for andy: "told you this stage was going to suck!" "told you it should have been a mountaintop finish!" "crimeny, what a great stage it could have been if only those last 25km had been chopped off!!"
2. i think sram should join forces with apple to invent the i-phone4 electronic shifting system.
3. everyone *except* me has missed THE story of the day: i am sure everyone remembers that just yesterday, andy told frank to call their mom to tell her he (andy) would be very careful to not take any risks on descents.
welllllllllllllllllllllll....alberto may be an unsporting, cut throat opportunist who thought nothing of taking advantage of young andy's bad luck BUT...he didn't lie to his mother.
bad andy. baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad andy!
apologies to all for the length of and tangents contained in this post. if i could ride and race a bike the way i can prattle on...i'd be the undisputed KING of pro cycling.