I was expecting much more from him this TdS.
I guess he won't be able to improve on his result from last year
I guess he won't be able to improve on his result from last year
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Dekker_Tifosi said:About as good in Suisse this year as last year.
Means no improvement, means no more progression to be made. This is it. Not much more than a lower end top 10 TDF rider.
Well, depending on how many favorites will fall out that is. If everyone somehow stays upright he's more likely to finish 11/12th
Roubaix stage could be to his advantage tho.. Mollema has little/no fear for those stages
Parrulo said:I was expecting much more from him this TdS.
I guess he won't be able to improve on his result from last year
Arredondo said:This makes no sense at all to me. He was good this Suisse, so why only a 11th place at the Tour? Last year, people complained that he was already too good in Suisse, which meant he was too bad in the third week.
His perfomance last weak doesn't say anything about the fact he could finish higher then last year, but also nothing about the opposite way. He will be good at the Tour, and then he will fight for a place in the top-10. Could be 10th, could be 5th. Who knows.
Jspear said:I agree with you. There is nothing from his performance in the TdS to indicate that he will be better or worse in the Tour this year over last year. The reason I think he will have a hard time placing higher than he did last year is because I think the competition will be tougher this year than last year. I think we could see him performing at a very similar level to last year. I just don't think that will be enough for him to do much more than 6th place.
Arredondo said:This makes no sense at all to me. He was good this Suisse, so why only a 11th place at the Tour? Last year, people complained that he was already too good in Suisse, which meant he was too bad in the third week.
His perfomance last weak doesn't say anything about the fact he could finish higher then last year, but also nothing about the opposite way. He will be good at the Tour, and then he will fight for a place in the top-10. Could be 10th, could be 5th. Who knows.
Arredondo said:Could be, but i'm curious why you think the competion is much stronger this year. We've got Nibali back this year, but no Quintana and Rodriguez (in terms of riding a GC).
hiero2 said:Why only 11th? Can't speak for others, but I tend to agree with this assessment. The GC competition at TdS was hardly deep or significant. Watching Mollema struggle to better Martin, who is not known for being a climber, was telling to me. My prediction for Bauke in TdF is top 20, maybe top 10 with a little luck.
I'll polish my crystal ball and see if it changes.
Arredondo said:Could be, but i'm curious why you think the competion is much stronger this year. We've got Nibali back this year, but no Quintana and Rodriguez (in terms of riding a GC).
Vino attacks everyone said:That people still doesn't understand the Suise and Dauphine are preperation races amazes me
A strong showing is allways good, but it doesn't mean you will perform any better in the tour. And a bad showing here doesn't really give us to much to go on for the tour either (of course, if you are 7kg overweight and last with under 1 month until the tour moutains one might worry a bit)
Jagartrott said:Mollema rode the Saas Fee climb slower than Tony Martin, even though he was towed for 16 of the 20 km, and Martin did most of the work himself. This was indeed a preparation race, but the guys in the Dauphiné showed much better climbing form I think.
Dekker_Tifosi said:This is a bad form of scoreboard journalism. Most of the climb it was Martin (/attackers in the second group) vs Wyss. Not Mollema.
Hell, before the final 3km, the gap dropped to like 1.35/1.40
The moment they attacked in the last 3km they gained 30 extra seconds on Martin. So about 10s every km.
Not to mention the initial attack from Frank/Mollema/costa on the previous climb where they gained another 30s in about a km. Before Vanmarcke towed them up to the group up front.
So you're using wrong calculations. Mollema and co defiantely climbed faster than Martin
The moment they attacked in the last 3km they gained 30 extra seconds on Martin. So about 10s every km.
You think he has great ears? Hm, I think they're rather ugly.Kokoso said:Mollema is decent rider but what else is great about him except for his ears?
theyoungest said:You think he has great ears? Hm, I think they're rather ugly.