The Official LANCE ARMSTRONG Thread 2010-2011

[Prodigy]

Just want to re-post what I actually wrote. Maybe I should change my name to Cassandra.

The pattern was that I disagreed that the French authorities are just waiting until June to release everything they have. This sounded to you like I might be saying they don't have anything - so straight in with the troll smear. "We might have someone who disagrees with us, chaps! Incredible!"

 

[Prodigy]

Ah, the old get killed in the time trials, get stomped in the mountains strategy. That sounds like a winner.

I was asked what would get him on the podium. Did he get on the podium last year?

 

[BroDeal]

I was asked what would get him on the podium. Did he get on the podium last year?

Does this year's course have a team time trial that will get rid of half the contenders? Does it have no mountain stages where climbers can really ply their trade?

Yeah, I thought not.

 

[Prodigy]

Does this year's course have a team time trial that will get rid of half the contenders? Does it have no mountain stages where climbers can really ply their trade?

Yeah, I thought not.

He's going to have to up his game, isn't he. I think he's in with a good chance of making the podium.

 

[B.Rasmussen]

You are correct Susan, but I think Prodigy needs to know something that should be said in the open - Over the last several months this forum was infested by a repeat troll who came on here and constantly antagonized members, including moderators and administrators. He kept re-registering with new names (BPC, RexHunter, MaxPower, Great White, etc.) and every single time got banned. His posting style started out short and cryptic, then needling and annoying, when people questioned him, he took on a persecution complex. So people see you start this way and speculate. It also doesn't help that you are posting from the same IP block and location that he did.

Just get rid of the pest. If the IP block and location isn't enough proof, then his already impressive amount of posted stupidity should be.

Now, if everybody could just please stop responding to the idiot until he is removed. Thank you.

 

[Publicus]

just get rid of the pest. If the ip block and location isn't enough proof, then his already impressive amount of posted stupidity should be.

Now, if everybody could just please stop responding to the idiot until he is removed. Thank you.

+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

 

[ravens]

Just get rid of the pest. If the IP block and location isn't enough proof, then his already impressive amount of posted stupidity should be.

Now, if everybody could just please stop responding to the idiot until he is removed. Thank you.

I confess you are right. This is an unbalanced person. I am going back and deleting any responses to him right now, on topic, off topic, whatever. This is not a person to be dealt with in my usual flippant manner.

 

[BYOP88]

He's going to have to up his game, isn't he. I think he's in with a good chance of making the podium.

I'm also in with a good shot of making the podium too!!!!

 

[Prodigy]

Just get rid of the pest. If the IP block and location isn't enough proof, then his already impressive amount of posted stupidity should be.

Oh, you're doing the thing of pretending I'm a troll as well. I see.

 

[Prodigy]

I confess you are right. This is an unbalanced person. I am going back and deleting any responses to him right now, on topic, off topic, whatever. This is not a person to be dealt with in my usual flippant manner.

Deleting posts just screws the threads.

Could you explain which comment I have made which makes me "unbalanced"? Someone else said I was polite and reasonable.

It seems like you're just making stuff up. That can't be right, can it? I am the person who has tried to stay on topic.

 

[Prodigy]

I'm also in with a good shot of making the podium too!!!!

Do you think Armstrong has a bad chance of making the podium? (is this question unbalanced?)

 

[Race Radio]

It also doesn't help that you are posting from the same IP block and location that he did.

I think we can all agree that the herpes of the message board has returned. From his mothers basement he is jumping for joy that someone is paying attention to him.

Of course he will pretend that he is not a troll, but as he has been banned multiple times and had hundreds of posts deleted we know this is not the case.

You would almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't such a sociopath.....no surprise he is a big fan of Armstrong.

 

[Hugh Januss]

Do you think Armstrong has a bad chance of making the podium? (is this question unbalanced?)

The questioner is unbalanced, the question is just awkward.

 

[patricknd]

maybe if they'd change that rule where everyone has to comment on and respond to the troll.... wait, there is no such rule? then why do you all respond ?

 

[progressor]

maybe if they'd change that rule where everyone has to comment on and respond to the troll.... wait, there is no such rule? then why do you all respond ?

Because some around here love abusing other posters? And somebody else can't get enough of that sort of attention, because at least it is attention? An extremely unhealthy but somewhat symbiotic relationship perhaps?

 

[Big GMaC]

i'm not seeing it? invisibility troll?

Jesus. I go to sleep and overnight 37 posts in the two LA/AC threads?

Pining to Susan? Same language tells...

That was a bold call after just 5 posts but word on that Pub.

invisibility troll is visible. The language reminds me more of Arbiter/BPC than CarbonCrank though.

Considering the last many pages have be related to the troll I have no way to link this post to Armstrong than asking: How much would you pay for a heavily used pair of his French Prison Overalls?

 

[patricknd]

Because some around here love abusing other posters? And somebody else can't get enough of that sort of attention, because at least it is attention? An extremely unhealthy but somewhat symbiotic relationship perhaps?

i think you are right.

 

[Prodigy]

God this is tedious.

Of course he will pretend that he is not a troll

But where is the evidence that he is a troll? Surely that's important?

but as he has been banned multiple times

Unfortunately we have the example of this thread where lots of people have called me a troll without citing anything. How do we know the same tactic wasn't used on this other guy? Was he banned for being banned without anyone citing trolling? I am increasingly suspicious.

and had hundreds of posts deleted we know this is not the case.

Do you have any evidence "hundreds" of posts were deleted? From my reading only about ten of his posts were deleted in his entire posting career. That's ten deletions from at least 2000 comments. There should be a ton of evidence this guy was a troll. Strange that I can't find anyway.

Now, does anyone want to talk about Lance Armstrong related topics?

 

[Race Radio]

God this is tedious.



But where is the evidence that he is a troll? Surely that's important?



Unfortunately we have the example of this thread where lots of people have called me a troll without citing anything. How do we know the same tactic wasn't used on this other guy? Was he banned for being banned without anyone citing trolling? I am increasingly suspicious.



Do you have any evidence "hundreds" of posts were deleted? From my reading only about ten of his posts were deleted in his entire posting career. That's ten deletions from at least 2000 comments. There should be a ton of evidence this guy was a troll. Strange that I can't find anyway.

Now, does anyone want to talk about Lance Armstrong related topics?

Thank you for proving my point Arbiter/Ban Pro Cycling/Max Power/Great White

 

[Prodigy]

Thank you for proving my point Arbiter/Ban Pro Cycling/Max Power/Great White

So you won't answer the questions.

It's time for you and others to stop trolling and get back to the subject of the thread. You tried your best trolling routine by making lots of false charges and smears, but it failed. Now move on or get off this forum. You're just completely disrespecting the mods with this behaviour.

 

[Big GMaC]

God this is tedious.

Yes it is. So **** off

But where is the evidence that he is a troll? Surely that's important?

You are the troll idiot

Unfortunately we have the example of this thread where lots of people have called me a troll without citing anything. How do we know the same tactic wasn't used on this other guy? Was he banned for being banned without anyone citing trolling? I am increasingly suspicious.

You are the troll. Here is how it works. Troll e.g. CarbonCrank gets banned. 5 minutes later new Poster arrives on the scene. You. Full of knowledge about what has happened on the forum over the the last few months. How is this possible? Because CC = Prodigy. Also your just stupid rate of posting...

Do you have any evidence "hundreds" of posts were deleted? From my reading only about ten of his posts were deleted in his entire posting career. That's ten deletions from at least 2000 comments. There should be a ton of evidence this guy was a troll. Strange that I can't find anyway.

Yes. They were there, now they are not. Post will still be recorded if they have been quoted by other members. I was only browsing the forum at the tail-end of the Jackhammer111 thing, but even I know all the posts are gone. Why are you obsessed with doing your inspector Clouseau act infront of everyone?

Now, does anyone want to talk about Lance Armstrong related topics?

No one want to talk about anything with you.

Not because everyone here hates LA, that is not true. It is because you are not capable of reasonable discussion, will resort to threats, then get banned and repeat...

____________________________________

 

[Prodigy]

You are the troll. Here is how it works. Troll e.g. CarbonCrank gets banned. 5 minutes later new Poster arrives on the scene.

Well at least you had a go at answering some of these questions. But your poor job rather tells the story for me.

I turned up a couple of hours before CC was banned.

Now, does anyone have anything to say about Armstrong?

 

[BroDeal]

Do you have any evidence "hundreds" of posts were deleted? From my reading only about ten of his posts were deleted in his entire posting career. That's ten deletions from at least 2000 comments. There should be a ton of evidence this guy was a troll. Strange that I can't find anyway.

Amazing how this new poster, who has no connection to the other usernames, knows how many posts were deleted. I suppose in the last few hours he read thousands of posts in hundreds of threads looking for quoted posts that no longer exist. Yeah, sure.

 

[Race Radio]

So you won't answer the questions.

It's time for you and others to stop trolling and get back to the subject of the thread. You tried your best trolling routine by making lots of false charges and smears, but it failed. Now move on or get off this forum. You're just completely disrespecting the mods with this behaviour.

So when you get banned tomorrow will this be your 11th or 12th username to be banned?

 

[kurtinsc]

You know... I have no idea if he's the same person as all the other posters or not.

But to be honest... I find this current incarnation more annoying then Carbon Crank if that is the case. Can we get rid of this one and bring Carbon Crank back?