The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
or forever,like lovkvist.Dekker_Tifosi said:Does not have the form of the Giro or Dauphine and appears to be a bit tired to me.
Should either save energy a couple of stages and see how it goes. Or if it doesn't go better after that drop out and call it a day. If you push too much you could destroy yourself for 2/3 seasons like young Kreuziger did
Yeah, Wilco should have a better chance in a normal tdf, Aru would need a favourable route to have a real chance. I still think both guys will be better than Majka.pablohidalgo7 said:I agree with you dekker tifosi the consistency of wilco is admirable. Aru is older than wilco, I think that he will be better than wilco in steep climbs, but i believe that wilco have more chances than fabio in a tour de france parcours with a 50 km time trial and climbs like the galibier.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Ofcourse he is not improving. He is stil more or less the same as in Utah. The difference with Anacona for example in day results is similar. In Utah Anacona was slightly better some days and slightly worse other days. Vuelta follows same pattern. There's just a bunch of other guys here who are in much better shape.
Kelderman is riding a bit like Majka last year. 7th in the Giro and 15th in the Vuelta now. Majka was 7th and 19th.
Think he had a bit too much race days between Giro and Vuelta to be top.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Majka did exactly the same as Kelderman in last years Vuelta and finished worse (19th), but he was a lot stronger this year.
So it is not necessarily bad to let a young guy ride a GT in normal form.
Flamin said:Majka took a break after the Giro, Kelderman the complete opposite.