Roglic's biggest burden will always be having lost a Tour with the best team, while Pogacar was practically alone for the entire Tour. From then on, all the debates about teams and domestiques are pointless.
The same could be said of Remco. In the Tour, you need a good team, but that's given to the favorite and the runner-up; everyone else has to earn it first. Only Landa in 2024 is better than any of Pogacar's teammates in 2020.
Pogacar went to the 2019 Vuelta and the 2020 Tour with a terrible team. He was alone on every mountain. They gave him a strong team after he had already won his first Tour. He had already shown he was very good in three weeks before having a good team.
I always say that cyclists like Ayuso or Del Toro have been very lucky. From their first GT, they've had a strong team. But instead of appreciating it, some, like Ayuso, complain, and the fans justify it. They should look at how other young riders fared in their first GT, Pogacar for example. UAE was a complete mediocre team, Aru was failing, and domestiques like Henao weren't even present on the penultimate mountain stage.
Remco has earned the right to be given a strong team, although to win the Tour de France, you first have to prove you can be one of the top two, and sometimes people talk about him as if he were Vingegard at TDF, and he hasn't shown anything of the sort. But there are other cyclists who complain for the sake of complaining without having yet shown they can aspire to win the Tour enough to demand teams with seven climbers.
I've gone off on a tangent. But Abi always talks about teams as if Roglic hasn't had the best in almost every GT he's raced as leader. He even had the best team, by far, in the Tour he lost, and Pogacar didn't even have the second-best team.