Because he hasn’t actually won much at all yet. He has 3 total professional wins. He’s right there with Oscar Onley, who has 2. Remco has 67, Roglic has 91. Hell, Lenny Martinez has 10 wins. I get that looking ahead isn’t about palmares, which is backward looking, but it’s unusual for someone to be hyped so thoroughly while having produced so little.
He also was weaker than a very poorly prepped Roglic on multiple stages in the Tour. He proved he can diesel up climbs in the rear view mirror of the top riders, that’s it. It’s a great start, but he hasn’t earned top billing yet. He needs to prove he is a winner, not just a guy who is in the mix. Others have been in the mix - Uran was right there behind Froome one year, Meintjes was often right there - but winners are built different. I think Lipowitz will become that, but he hasn’t proved it yet.
I mean look at the comparison to Isaac del Toro, who is 4 years younger and has only 2 years as a pro vs 3. He has 21 wins.
Head to head career results between Isaac del Toro and Florian Lipowitz. The overal score is 63.3% for Isaac del Toro versus 36.7% for Florian Lipowitz. A comparison on same race results, time trial points and the points per age.
www.procyclingstats.com