Actually, in this latest debates you tried to dispute my both "major" claims until i pointed out it's Remco that has such opinions. Then you did change your mind and sided with Remco easily. The same for example happened with
@red_flanders, he even went as far to argue about semantics. On how the same thing one can agree with and not to agree with based on what you would like the outcome to be. Painting some artificial difference. Shamelessly.
Note that i don't hold it against you guys.
I am sure that Remco would be fine with it, being in such position.