• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread

Page 1120 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Should we change the thread title?


  • Total voters
    131
Evenepoel now also has a golden TT bike.

8993688c-9fb5-40e0-8d03-185f10b13770.jpg


More images of his recon/prep
16c4826f-f3e7-4d74-bd69-e34f4c33a796.jpg


60012de6-e9c5-474b-b25e-e9d496880cc0.jpg


5e84bb97-3b64-4877-841a-1ddedca5419b.jpg


141b67fa-39f8-4dfd-8942-4874903b65ba.jpg
 
We weren’t talking about the same thing. You were over-simplifying and that’s why you think it’s the same thing, looked at from opposite direction. In one post you were talking about riders who were not comfortable in TT position and in the other post you were talking about riders, who have bad aero on a road bike.
I think i have been clear about what i meant. Being aero, having a low CdA, means your front aerea hits as little air as possible and your shape allows for as little drag behind as possible. This can be due to bodyshape, size and positioning on the bike, which in its turn is also decided by how flexible and agile a person is. The fact of the matter remains, that a person who is by nature able to cut through the air better, will see less improvement from going from a road bike to a TT bike, but will also lose less of his advantage by going from a TT bike to a road bike.

You can try your best to frame my reasoning as something controversial, but it is not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joe_papp
I think i have been clear about what i meant. Being aero, having a low CdA, means your front aerea hits as little air as possible and your shape allows for as little drag behind as possible. This can be due to bodyshape, size and positioning on the bike, which in its turn is also decided by how flexible and agile a person is. The fact of the matter remains, that a person who is by nature able to cut through the air better, will see less improvement from going from a road bike to a TT bike, but will also lose less of his advantage by going from a TT bike to a road bike.

You can try your best to frame my reasoning as something controversial, but it is not.
It's not a controversial reasoning and I understand your point . I just think it’s too simplistic, unproven and far from "fact of the matter"...
 
Last edited:
It's not a controversial reasoning and I understand your point . I just think it’s too simplistic, unproven and far from "fact of the matter"...
You say unproven all the time. Is it proven that a larger person hits more wind on a bike than a smaller person? Is it proven that a person who sits more upright on a bike is less aerodynamic than a person who is more tucked in? If you consider this proven, then by logical deduction my point is also proven. The bigger the discrepancy between one's frontal area on a road bike and a TT bike, the more advantage one will have on a TT bike compared to a road bike, and the more disadvantage one will have on a road bike compared to a TT bike.
 
You say unproven all the time. Is it proven that a larger person hits more wind on a bike than a smaller person? Is it proven that a person who sits more upright on a bike is less aerodynamic than a person who is more tucked in? If you consider this proven, then by logical deduction my point is also proven. The bigger the discrepancy between one's frontal area on a road bike and a TT bike, the more advantage one will have on a TT bike compared to a road bike, and the more disadvantage one will have on a road bike compared to a TT bike.
What’s not proven is that larger person on a bike has a bigger CdA. A larger person will hit more wind (that’s a fact) but could still face less wind resistance due to other factors, yes? Frontal area is just one of the parameters of aerodynamic drag.

And that’s an important point. You can’t just simplify and say aerodynamic drag is linearly proportional to frontal area. And as soon as it’s not linearly proportional, your point is not proven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvarani
It is also proven that in sports quite often the results are unexpected (or not logical) and that's why we love sport; It is also proven that after the race people ten to logically explain the unexpected results.
It is logical to assume on past results that Remco is a better rouleur, whatever a rouleur is anyway..
It is logical to assume that any comparison with Pogacar based on results before this year is utter nonsense, so big has been his progression.
It is logical to assume that next sunday they will be racing each other.
It is logical to assume that Pogacar, based on this years results is the most likely winner.
It is logical to assume that Evenepoel will be his closest competitor.
And starting monday then we can start this discussion again, armed with some facts.
 
Interview with Evenepoel today. Key takeaways:
  • He’s feeling the way he felt before the start of the Tour.
  • He has a big chance to win ITT but doesn’t want to write off Tarling/Ganna
  • Pogacar is in great form, but he believes he should be able to challenge him


 
Interview with Evenepoel today. Key takeaways:
  • He’s feeling the way he felt before the start of the Tour.
  • He has a big chance to win ITT but doesn’t want to write off Tarling/Ganna
  • Pogacar is in great form, but he believes he should be able to challenge him


Good news. We need a opponent to contest Pogacar's dominance. Unfortunately, the TT will be a mere formality
 
Remco beat Pogacar in wollongdong and in my opinion he would also have in Paris if pogacar bothered to attend.

He needs to employ similar tactics in the zurich.
Pog was dead after the Tour, so lots of riders would've finished ahead in Paris.

In 2022, Pog made 3 tactical errors.

4 in a 2 man sprint, could've been second at best

Letting Jonas and Rogla playing with him, should've let Rogla go.

Didn't jump on Remco's wheel
 
Congratz Remco. Close battle, Even without the Roglic draft for Ganna. But you brought the victory home.

Not sure what this means for the road race. Someone else can think about weight, power, ... and all that jazz.

Apparantly he did the TT without a power meter. So if UCI ever decides to ban them, he seems to know his body well enough to function without it.

In any case, I'm just stoked.
 
Last edited: